These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36250612)

  • 1. Current trends in read-across applications for chemical risk assessments and chemical registrations in the Republic of Korea.
    Lee SH; Kim J; Kim J; Park J; Park S; Kim KB; Lee BM; Kwon S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2022 Nov; 25(8):393-404. PubMed ID: 36250612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Read-across approaches: current applications and regulatory acceptance in Korea, Japan, and China.
    Lee BM; Lee SH; Yamada T; Park S; Wang Y; Kim KB; Kwon S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2022 Mar; 85(5):184-197. PubMed ID: 34670481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards quantitative read across: Prediction of Ames mutagenicity in a large database.
    Benigni R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Nov; 108():104434. PubMed ID: 31374229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A practice of expert review by read-across using QSAR Toolbox.
    Fukuchi J; Kitazawa A; Hirabayashi K; Honma M
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 30690463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relevance and Application of Read-Across - Mini Review of European Consensus Platform for Alternatives and Scandinavian Society for Cell Toxicology 2017 Workshop Session.
    Stuard SB; Heinonen T
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 123 Suppl 5():37-41. PubMed ID: 29524304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Read-across: Principle, case study and its potential regulatory application in China.
    Gao R; Guan N; Huang M; Foreman J; Kung M; Rong Z; Su Y; Sweet L; Zhu B; Zhu H; Zou H; Li B; Wang Y; Yin H; Yin Z; Zhang X
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Oct; 116():104728. PubMed ID: 32649957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematically evaluating read-across prediction and performance using a local validity approach characterized by chemical structure and bioactivity information.
    Shah I; Liu J; Judson RS; Thomas RS; Patlewicz G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Aug; 79():12-24. PubMed ID: 27174420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QSAR Use in REACH Analyses of Alternatives to Predict Human Health and Environmental Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Substances.
    Chinen K; Malloy T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Sep; 16(5):745-760. PubMed ID: 32162772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating QSAR and read-across for environmental assessment.
    Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A; Petoumenou MI; Cappelli CI; Gini G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(7-9):605-18. PubMed ID: 26535447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying the benefits of using read-across and in silico techniques to fulfill hazard data requirements for chemical categories.
    Stanton K; Kruszewski FH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Nov; 81():250-259. PubMed ID: 27612993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EFSA's OpenFoodTox: An open source toxicological database on chemicals in food and feed and its future developments.
    Dorne JLCM; Richardson J; Livaniou A; Carnesecchi E; Ceriani L; Baldin R; Kovarich S; Pavan M; Saouter E; Biganzoli F; Pasinato L; Zare Jeddi M; Robinson TP; Kass GEN; Liem AKD; Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Yang C; Tarkhov A; Georgiadis N; Di Nicola MR; Mostrag A; Verhagen H; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E; Bassan A
    Environ Int; 2021 Jan; 146():106293. PubMed ID: 33395940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In silico assessment of genotoxicity. Combinations of sensitive structural alerts minimize false negative predictions for all genotoxicity endpoints and can single out chemicals for which experimentation can be avoided.
    Benigni R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Nov; 126():105042. PubMed ID: 34506881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project.
    Escher SE; Kamp H; Bennekou SH; Bitsch A; Fisher C; Graepel R; Hengstler JG; Herzler M; Knight D; Leist M; Norinder U; Ouédraogo G; Pastor M; Stuard S; White A; Zdrazil B; van de Water B; Kroese D
    Arch Toxicol; 2019 Dec; 93(12):3643-3667. PubMed ID: 31781791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the Safety Assessment of Chemicals and Drug Candidates by the Integration of Bioinformatics and Chemoinformatics Data.
    Steger-Hartmann T; Pognan F
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 123 Suppl 5():29-36. PubMed ID: 29316298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of In Silico Methods for Regulatory Toxicological Assessment of Pharmaceutical Impurities.
    Kovarich S; Cappelli CI
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2425():537-560. PubMed ID: 35188646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward regulatory acceptance and improving the prediction confidence of in silico approaches: a case study of genotoxicity.
    Tcheremenskaia O; Benigni R
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):987-1005. PubMed ID: 34078212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods.
    Worth AP; Bassan A; De Bruijn J; Gallegos Saliner A; Netzeva T; Patlewicz G; Pavan M; Tsakovska I; Eisenreich S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):111-25. PubMed ID: 17365963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences.
    Valerio LG
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 241(3):356-70. PubMed ID: 19716836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chemical Safety Assessment Using Read-Across: Assessing the Use of Novel Testing Methods to Strengthen the Evidence Base for Decision Making.
    Berggren E; Amcoff P; Benigni R; Blackburn K; Carney E; Cronin M; Deluyker H; Gautier F; Judson RS; Kass GE; Keller D; Knight D; Lilienblum W; Mahony C; Rusyn I; Schultz T; Schwarz M; Schüürmann G; White A; Burton J; Lostia AM; Munn S; Worth A
    Environ Health Perspect; 2015 Dec; 123(12):1232-40. PubMed ID: 25956009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.