These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36250970)

  • 1. Dipole Flow Tracer Test Models for Identifying Skin Properties and Ambient Groundwater Flow Effects.
    Zhu Q; Wen Z
    Ground Water; 2023; 61(4):532-543. PubMed ID: 36250970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of small-scale low and high permeability layers using single well forced-gradient tracer tests: fluorescent dye imaging and modelling at the laboratory-scale.
    Barns GL; Thornton SF; Wilson RD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():84-99. PubMed ID: 25478669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fluorescent dye imaging of the volume sampled by single well forced-gradient tracer tests evaluated in a laboratory-scale aquifer physical model.
    Barns GL; Wilson RD; Thornton SF
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Feb; 128(1-4):58-70. PubMed ID: 22192345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining 3D Hydraulic Tomography with Tracer Tests for Improved Transport Characterization.
    Sanchez-León E; Leven C; Haslauer CP; Cirpka OA
    Ground Water; 2016 Jul; 54(4):498-507. PubMed ID: 26441342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-Screened Vertical Circulation Wells for Groundwater Lowering in Unconfined Aquifers.
    Jin Y; Holzbecher E; Sauter M
    Ground Water; 2016 Jan; 54(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25801278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Groundwater flow velocities in karst aquifers; importance of spatial observation scale and hydraulic testing for contaminant transport prediction.
    Medici G; West LJ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(32):43050-43063. PubMed ID: 34125385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fractional flow in fractured chalk; a flow and tracer test revisited.
    Odling NE; West LJ; Hartmann S; Kilpatrick A
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Apr; 147():96-111. PubMed ID: 23501945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of steady-state hydraulic tomography to inform the selection of a chaotic advection system.
    Cho MS; Zhao Z; Thomson NR; Illman WA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Feb; 229():103559. PubMed ID: 31784037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of ERT, Saline Tracer and Numerical Studies to Delineate Preferential Paths in Fractured Granites.
    Sreeparvathy V; Kambhammettu BVNP; Peddinti SR; Sarada PSL
    Ground Water; 2019 Jan; 57(1):126-139. PubMed ID: 29569235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of groundwater flow patterns around a dual-screened groundwater circulation well.
    Johnson RL; Simon MA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):188-202. PubMed ID: 17428573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new solution to transient single-well push-pull test with low-permeability non-Darcian leakage effects.
    Zhu Q; Wen Z; Jakada H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Oct; 234():103689. PubMed ID: 32836106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving estimates of groundwater velocity in a fractured rock borehole using hydraulic and tracer dilution methods.
    Maldaner CH; Quinn PM; Cherry JA; Parker BL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jul; 214():75-86. PubMed ID: 29907430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of small-scale preferential flow with a forced-gradient tracer test.
    Bianchi M; Zheng C; Tick GR; Gorelick SM
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(4):503-14. PubMed ID: 20807245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Method to Estimate the Hydraulic Conductivity of the Ground by TRT Analysis.
    Liuzzo Scorpo A; Nordell B; Gehlin S
    Ground Water; 2017 Jan; 55(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27479510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of multiple tracer methods to estimate low groundwater flow velocities.
    Reimus PW; Arnold BW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Apr; 199():1-13. PubMed ID: 28262572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of local scale dispersion from local breakthrough curves during a tracer test in a heterogeneous aquifer: the Lagrangian approach.
    Vanderborght J; Vereecken H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2002 Jan; 54(1-2):141-71. PubMed ID: 11848265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of unsaturated flow and solute transport through waste rock at two experimental scales using temporal moments and numerical modeling.
    Blackmore S; Smith L; Ulrich Mayer K; Beckie RD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Dec; 171():49-65. PubMed ID: 25461887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flow transiency on analytical modeling of subsurface solute transport.
    Li X; Wen Z; Zhu Q; Jakada H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Nov; 27(31):38974-38986. PubMed ID: 32632697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical assessments of recharge-dominated groundwater flow and transport in the nearshore reclamation area in western Taiwan.
    Ni CF; Li WC; Hsu SM; Lee IH; Lin CP
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jan; 191(2):83. PubMed ID: 30659403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Water and solute transport in agricultural soils predicted by volumetric clay and silt contents.
    Karup D; Moldrup P; Paradelo M; Katuwal S; Norgaard T; Greve MH; de Jonge LW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep; 192():194-202. PubMed ID: 27509309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.