These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36251884)

  • 1. Recognition of Interrupted Speech, Text, and Text-Supplemented Speech by Older Adults: Effect of Interruption Rate.
    Fogerty D; Madorskiy R; Vickery B; Shafiro V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Nov; 65(11):4404-4416. PubMed ID: 36251884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.
    Shafiro V; Fogerty D; Smith K; Sheft S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 61(10):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 30458532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining partial information from speech and text.
    Fogerty D; Iftikhar I; Madorskiy R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Feb; 147(2):EL189. PubMed ID: 32113272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of partial information for spoken and written sentence recognition by older listeners.
    Smith KG; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):EL240. PubMed ID: 27369179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.
    Smith KG; Fogerty D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1805-17. PubMed ID: 26536081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations on Recognition Performance by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; Sharrett KC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 28054913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconstructing wholes from parts: effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition.
    Krull V; Humes LE; Kidd GR
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 23165223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition Performance of Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations.
    Wilson RH; Hamm HM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 26218055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Older adult recognition error patterns when listening to interrupted speech and speech in steady-state noise.
    Smith KG; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3428. PubMed ID: 34852602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of modality onset asynchrony and processing time on the recognition of text-supplemented speech.
    Smith KG; Fogerty D
    JASA Express Lett; 2023 Feb; 3(2):025202. PubMed ID: 36858993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Risley R; Gygi B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):745-56. PubMed ID: 25698009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of interrupted speech and text: Listener and modality factors.
    Fogerty D; Dubno JR; Shafiro V
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Jun; 2(6):064402. PubMed ID: 36154160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variables that influence the recognition performance of interrupted words: rise-fall shape and temporal location of the interruptions.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(7):688-96. PubMed ID: 25365371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The intelligibility of interrupted speech depends upon its uninterrupted intelligibility.
    Ardoint M; Green T; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):EL275-80. PubMed ID: 25324110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.