BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36257513)

  • 1. Microbiological models for accelerated development of secondary caries in vitro.
    Ionescu AC; Hahnel S; Delvecchio P; Ilie N; Moldovan M; Zambelli V; Bellani G; Brambilla E
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104333. PubMed ID: 36257513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Secondary caries formation with a two-species biofilm artificial mouth.
    Amend S; Frankenberger R; Lücker S; Domann E; Krämer N
    Dent Mater; 2018 May; 34(5):786-796. PubMed ID: 29544984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model.
    Krämer N; Schmidt M; Lücker S; Domann E; Frankenberger R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):1019-1031. PubMed ID: 28741172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TEGDMA-Functionalized Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate Resin-Based Composites Prevent Secondary Caries in an In Vitro Biofilm Model.
    Ionescu AC; Hahnel S; Chiari MDS; König A; Delvecchio P; Braga RR; Zambelli V; Brambilla E
    J Funct Biomater; 2022 Nov; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36412873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of caries risk at resin composite margins.
    Krämer N; Kunzelmann KH; García-Godoy F; Häberlein I; Meier B; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17380810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of open-sandwich vs. adhesive restorative techniques on enamel and dentine demineralization: an in situ study.
    Kirsten GA; Rached RN; Mazur RF; Vieira S; Souza EM
    J Dent; 2013 Oct; 41(10):872-80. PubMed ID: 23851134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of glass ionomer cement and composite resin on microscale pH in cariogenic biofilms and demineralization of dental tissues.
    Schlafer S; Bornmann T; Paris S; Göstemeyer G
    Dent Mater; 2021 Oct; 37(10):1576-1583. PubMed ID: 34419256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model.
    Serra MC; Cury JA
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Feb; 23(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 1641453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbiological or chemical models of enamel secondary caries compared by polarized-light microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.
    Paradella TC; de Sousa FA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Aug; 90(2):635-40. PubMed ID: 19204918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentin and enamel demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of Vitremer, Z 100 and Cention N.
    Donly KJ; Liu JA
    Am J Dent; 2018 Jun; 31(3):166-168. PubMed ID: 30028936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of luting cement on dental biofilm composition and secondary caries around metallic restorations in situ.
    Moura JS; Lima EM; Paes Leme AF; Del Bel Cury AA; Tabchoury CP; Cury JA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 15470872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on adjacent interproximal caries.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Wefel JS; Hogan MM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jun; 130(6):817-25. PubMed ID: 10377639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevention of secondary caries by silver diamine fluoride.
    Mei ML; Zhao IS; Ito L; Lo EC; Chu CH
    Int Dent J; 2016 Apr; 66(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 26689611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical study of the caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations: aging versus the influence of fluoride dentifrice.
    de Moraes MD; de Melo MA; Bezerra Dda S; Costa LS; Saboía Vde P; Rodrigues LK
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 May; 7(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 25573328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.