135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36257513)
21. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro evaluation of secondary caries development in enamel and root dentin around luted metallic restoration.
Shinkai RS; Cury AA; Cury JA
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11203778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Restoration integrity, but not material or cementation strategy determined secondary caries lesions next to indirect restorations in vitro.
Lehmensiek M; Askar H; Brouwer F; Blunck U; Paris S; Schwendicke F
Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):e317-e323. PubMed ID: 30269863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Inhibition of dentin demineralization adjacent to a glass-ionomer/composite sandwich restoration.
Tantbirojn D; Rusin RP; Bui HT; Mitra SB
Quintessence Int; 2009 Apr; 40(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 19417873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Micro-computed tomography assessment of root dentin around fluoride-releasing restorations after demineralization/remineralization.
Zan KW; Nakamura K; Hamba H; Sadr A; Nikaido T; Tagami J
Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Oct; 126(5):390-399. PubMed ID: 30055024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vivo vs in vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Eliades G
Dent Mater; 2002 Dec; 18(8):561-9. PubMed ID: 12385896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel.
Hicks MJ; Flaitz CM
Quintessence Int; 2000 Sep; 31(8):570-8. PubMed ID: 11203979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of Fluoride-containing Restorative Materials on Dentin Adhesion and Demineralization of Hard Tissues Adjacent to Restorations.
Almeida Ayres AP; Tabchoury CP; Bittencourt Berger S; Yamauti M; Bovi Ambrosano GM; Giannini M
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 26258176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Enamel and dentin demineralization inhibition of fluoride-releasing materials.
Donly KJ
Am J Dent; 1994 Oct; 7(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 7986452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. ER-YAG laser pretreatment effect on in vitro secondary caries formation around composite restorations.
Ceballos L; Toledano M; Osorio R; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C; Hicks J
Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 11806480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experimental composites containing quaternary ammonium methacrylates reduce demineralization at enamel-restoration margins after cariogenic challenge.
Maia AC; Mangabeira A; Vieira R; Neves AA; Lopes RT; Pires TM; Viana GM; Cabral LM; Cavalcante LM; Portela MB
Dent Mater; 2019 Aug; 35(8):e175-e183. PubMed ID: 31204047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Inhibition of demineralization adjacent to tooth-colored restorations in primary teeth after 2 in vitro challenges.
Takeuti ML; Marquezan M; Rodrigues CR; Rodrigues Filho LE; Rocha Rde O
J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 18482516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An in vitro caries inhibition of photopolymerized glass ionomer liners.
Donly KJ; Ingram C
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 9189003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Kieri C
Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of restorative materials using a new perfusion system.
Savarino L; Greco M; Baldini N; Giunti A; Pistone M; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Prati C
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Aug; 10(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 18792697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Caries inhibition by a resin-modified and a conventional glass ionomer cement, in vitro.
Dunne SM; Goolnik JS; Millar BJ; Seddon RP
J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8636500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Streptococcus mutans-induced secondary caries adjacent to glass ionomer cement, composite resin and amalgam restorations in vitro.
Gama-Teixeira A; Simionato MR; Elian SN; Sobral MA; Luz MA
Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 18060266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro analysis of inhibitory effects of the antibacterial monomer MDPB-containing restorations on the progression of secondary root caries.
Thomé T; Mayer MP; Imazato S; Geraldo-Martins VR; Marques MM
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):705-11. PubMed ID: 19540033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
