153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36259232)
1. Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology.
Hjerpe A; Demir E; Abd-Own S; Dobra K
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(5):5334-5340. PubMed ID: 36259232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma, non-small cell carcinoma involving the pleura, and benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation].
Szczepulska-Wójcik E; Langfort R; Roszkowski-Sliz K
Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 2007; 75(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 17541913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic utility of D2-40, calretinin, CK5/6, desmin and MOC-31 in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in pleural effusion cytology.
Hyun TS; Barnes M; Tabatabai ZL
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 23075894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic usefulness of EMA, IMP3, and GLUT-1 for the immunocytochemical distinction of malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cytology using cytospin preparations.
Ikeda K; Tate G; Suzuki T; Kitamura T; Mitsuya T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Jun; 39(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 21574259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial cells in effusions by Glut-1, EMA, and Desmin expression: an evidence-based approach.
Kuperman M; Florence RR; Pantanowitz L; Visintainer PF; Cibas ES; Otis CN
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Feb; 41(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 23002041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytologic malignancy versus benignancy: how useful are the "newer" markers in body fluid cytology?
Lyons-Boudreaux V; Mody DR; Zhai J; Coffey D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Jan; 132(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 18181669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of BRCA1-associated protein-1, glucose transporter-1 and desmin expression in the discrimination between reactive mesothelial proliferation and malignant mesothelioma in tissues and effusions.
Önder S; Özogul E; Koksal D; Sarinc Ulasli S; Firat P; Emri S
Cytopathology; 2019 Nov; 30(6):592-600. PubMed ID: 31165505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions.
Hasteh F; Lin GY; Weidner N; Michael CW
Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 118(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 20209622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reactivity of six antibodies in effusions of mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and mesotheliosis: stepwise logistic regression analysis.
Dejmek A; Hjerpe A
Cytopathology; 2000 Feb; 11(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 10714371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytological differential diagnosis among adenocarcinoma, epithelial mesothelioma, and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions by immunocytochemistry.
Su XY; Li GD; Liu WP; Xie B; Jiang YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 39(12):900-8. PubMed ID: 20836004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Value of immunocytochemistry in differential diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma, reactive mesothelial cells and malignant epithelial mesothelioma in metastatic effusion fluid].
Lyu M; Cha N; Zou YF; Leng JH; Xu L; Sun Y; Hao YY
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 47(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 29534357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Calretinin staining pattern aids in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions.
Chhieng DC; Yee H; Schaefer D; Cangiarella JF; Jagirdar J; Chiriboga LA; Jagirdar J; Chiriboga LA; Cohen JM
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 10896333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pericardial malignant mesothelioma diagnosed in a dog by immunocytochemistry of the pericardial fluid: a case report.
Choi EW
BMC Vet Res; 2023 Jul; 19(1):89. PubMed ID: 37480011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of anti-L523S antibody in the diagnosis of benign and malignant serous effusions.
Hanley KZ; Facik MS; Bourne PA; Yang Q; Spaulding BO; Bonfiglio TA; Xu H
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 18098206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelium. A novel use for desmin and comparative evaluation with epithelial membrane antigen, p53, platelet-derived growth factor-receptor, P-glycoprotein and Bcl-2.
Attanoos RL; Griffin A; Gibbs AR
Histopathology; 2003 Sep; 43(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 12940775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of immunocytochemical and histochemical stainings in the distinction between reactive mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma cells in body effusions.
Chen CJ; Chang SC; Tseng HH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1994 Sep; 54(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 7954054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical markers in the differential diagnosis of effusion cytology.
Yahya ZM; Ali HH; Hussein HG
Oman Med J; 2013 Nov; 28(6):410-6. PubMed ID: 24223244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of Claudin-4 versus BerEP4 and B72.3 in pleural fluids with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.
Patel A; Borczuk AC; Siddiqui MT
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(3):146-151. PubMed ID: 32184064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of calretinin and cytokeratin 5/6 as markers for mesothelioma in cell block preparations of serous effusions.
Shield PW; Koivurinne K
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 17916095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peritoneal malignant mesothelioma (PMM), and primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RMH) of the peritoneum. Immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analyses.
Kawai T; Tominaga S; Hiroi S; Ogata S; Nakanishi K; Kawahara K; Sonobe H; Hiroshima K
J Clin Pathol; 2016 Aug; 69(8):706-12. PubMed ID: 26729015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
