These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36259259)

  • 1. Usability testing of three visual HMIs for assisted driving: How design impacts driver distraction and mental models.
    Perrier MJR; Louw TL; Carsten OMJ
    Ergonomics; 2023 Aug; 66(8):1142-1163. PubMed ID: 36259259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of human-machine interface modality, specificity, and timing on driver performance and behavior while using vehicle automation.
    Wang M; Parker J; Wong N; Mehrotra S; Roberts SC; Kim W; Romo A; Horrey WJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107606. PubMed ID: 38733810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impacts of information quantity and display formats on driving behaviors in a connected vehicle environment.
    Zhao W; Gong S; Zhao D; Liu F; Sze NN; Quddus M; Huang H; Zhao X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107621. PubMed ID: 38729056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the impact of HMI on drivers' merging performance in intelligent connected vehicle environment.
    Wang Y; Lyu N; Wu C; Du Z; Deng M; Wu H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107448. PubMed ID: 38340472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Redesigning Today's Driving Automation Toward Adaptive Backup Control With Context-Based and Invisible Interfaces.
    Cabrall CDD; Stapel JCJ; Happee R; de Winter JCF
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):211-228. PubMed ID: 31995390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adopting an HMI for overtaking assistance - Impact of distance display, advice, and guidance information on driver gaze and performance.
    Fu R; Liu W; Zhang H; Liu X; Yuan W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107204. PubMed ID: 37454562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiovisual presentation of variable message signs improves message processing in distracted drivers during partially automated driving.
    Pi-Ruano M; Roca J; Tejero P
    J Safety Res; 2024 Jun; 89():172-180. PubMed ID: 38858040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the visual-manual resources required to perform calling and navigation tasks in conventional mode with a portable phone and in full- touch mode with an embedded system.
    Fu R; Zhao X; Li Z; Zhao C; Wang C
    Ergonomics; 2023 Oct; 66(10):1633-1651. PubMed ID: 36533714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond adaptive cruise control and lane centering control: drivers' mental model of and trust in emerging ADAS technologies.
    Huang C; He D; Wen X; Yan S
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1236062. PubMed ID: 37614491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.
    Muslim H; Itoh M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 63(7):1295-1315. PubMed ID: 32484749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driver Expectations of a Partial Driving Automation System in Relation to Branding and Training.
    Singer J; Tefft BC; Benson A; Jenness JW; Horrey WJ
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1531-1544. PubMed ID: 36530124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploratory Development of Algorithms for Determining Driver Attention Status.
    Herbers E; Miller M; Neurauter L; Walters J; Glaser D
    Hum Factors; 2023 Sep; ():187208231198932. PubMed ID: 37732402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shared control versus traded control in driving: a debate around automation pitfalls.
    de Winter JCF; Petermeijer SM; Abbink DA
    Ergonomics; 2023 Oct; 66(10):1494-1520. PubMed ID: 36476120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying interaction types and functionality for automated vehicle virtual assistants: An exploratory study using speech acts cluster analysis.
    Clark JR; Large DR; Shaw E; Nichele E; Galvez Trigo MJ; Fischer JE; Burnett G; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Jan; 114():104152. PubMed ID: 37856899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the impact of typeface design in a text-rich automotive user interface.
    Reimer B; Mehler B; Dobres J; Coughlin JF; Matteson S; Gould D; Chahine N; Levantovsky V
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(11):1643-58. PubMed ID: 25075429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive automation: automatically (dis)engaging automation during visually distracted driving.
    Cabrall CDD; Janssen NM; de Winter JCF
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2018; 4():e166. PubMed ID: 33816819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional warnings caused by driver monitoring systems: How often do they appear and how well are they understood?
    Forster Y; Schoemig N; Kremer C; Wiedemann K; Gary S; Naujoks F; Keinath A; Neukum A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107684. PubMed ID: 38945045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does in-vehicle automation help individuals with Parkinson's disease? A preliminary analysis.
    Giang WCW; Zheng H; Gibson B; Patel B; Ramirez-Zamora A; Winter S; Jeghers M; Li Y; Classen S
    Front Neurol; 2023; 14():1225751. PubMed ID: 37900602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [ADAS and automation-a relevant contribution to maintaining mobility of older drivers?].
    Fastenmeier W
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38995361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver behavior while using Level 2 vehicle automation: a hybrid naturalistic study.
    Cooper JM; Crabtree KW; McDonnell AS; May D; Strayer SC; Tsogtbaatar T; Cook DR; Alexander PA; Sanbonmatsu DM; Strayer DL
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Dec; 8(1):71. PubMed ID: 38117387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.