These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36259298)
1. Reliability of Frankfort Horizontal Plane with True Horizontal Plane in Cephalometric Measurements. Devi SS; Dinesh S; Sivakumar A; Nivethigaa B; Alshehri A; Awadh W; Alam MK; Bhandi S; Raj AT; Patil S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):601-605. PubMed ID: 36259298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking and Frankfort Horizontal Plane Construction: Reproducibility of Conventional and Novel Landmarks. Dot G; Rafflenbeul F; Kerbrat A; Rouch P; Gajny L; Schouman T J Clin Med; 2021 Nov; 10(22):. PubMed ID: 34830583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs. Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability of the inclination of anatomic horizontal reference planes of the craniofacial complex in relation to the true horizontal line in orthognathic patients. Zebeib AM; Naini FB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 25432255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical study of orientation and reference planes in cephalometry]. El-Hayeck E; Bou Assi S; Bou-Serhal J Orthod Fr; 2005 Sep; 76(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 16300124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes. Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study between data obtained from conventional lateral cephalometry and reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images. Oh S; Kim CY; Hong J J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 25045639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of different setups of the Frankfort horizontal plane on 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements. Santos RMGD; De Martino JM; Haiter Neto F; Passeri LA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Aug; 152(2):242-249. PubMed ID: 28760286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The evaluation of horizontal reference planes of adult Chinese in natural head position. Hung CH Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1991 Mar; 10(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 1820825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of head rotation on two-dimensional cephalometric measurements using cone beam-computed tomography. El Hayeck E; Bassil-Nassif N; Khairallah A; El Wak T; Bouserhal J Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2747-2761. PubMed ID: 36631596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Frankfort horizontal as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Lundström A; Lundström F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 May; 107(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 7733063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cephalometric study to establish the relationship of the occlusal plane to the three different ala-tragal lines and the Frankfort horizontal plane in different head forms. Subhas S; Rupesh PL; Devanna R; Kumar DRV; Paliwal A; Solanki P J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 118(2):73-77. PubMed ID: 28345510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study. Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms. Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Cephalometric Evaluation of Sexual Dimorphism of the Angle Sella-Nasion-Frankfort Horizontal Plane in Different Sagittal Classes of Malocclusion in South Indian Population. Reddy SR; Sankar SG; Mandava P; Ganugapanta VR; Gangavarapu S; Doddavarapu S J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 31058062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cephalometric Evaluation of Natural Head Position in Lingayat Population of Karnataka. Singh I; Kumar KK; Raj P; Babu RH; Pithani N; Thekiya AH J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2019 Feb; 11(Suppl 1):S59-S66. PubMed ID: 30923432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients]. Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation of the variability between the optic plane and Frankfort horizontal. Tremont TJ Am J Orthod; 1980 Aug; 78(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 6931488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]