159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36260341)
1. Controlled Shrinkage of Microfluidically Generated Microbubbles by Tuning Lipid Concentration.
Zalloum IO; Paknahad AA; Kolios MC; Karshafian R; Tsai SSH
Langmuir; 2022 Nov; 38(43):13021-13029. PubMed ID: 36260341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microfluidic Generation of Monodisperse Nanobubbles by Selective Gas Dissolution.
Xu J; Salari A; Wang Y; He X; Kerr L; Darbandi A; de Leon AC; Exner AA; Kolios MC; Yuen D; Tsai SSH
Small; 2021 May; 17(20):e2100345. PubMed ID: 33811441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shrinking microbubbles with microfluidics: mathematical modelling to control microbubble sizes.
Salari A; Gnyawali V; Griffiths IM; Karshafian R; Kolios MC; Tsai SSH
Soft Matter; 2017 Nov; 13(46):8796-8806. PubMed ID: 29135012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Honey, I shrunk the bubbles: microfluidic vacuum shrinkage of lipid-stabilized microbubbles.
Gnyawali V; Moon BU; Kieda J; Karshafian R; Kolios MC; Tsai SSH
Soft Matter; 2017 Jun; 13(22):4011-4016. PubMed ID: 28379267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Controlled Tempering of Lipid Concentration and Microbubble Shrinkage as a Possible Mechanism for Fine-Tuning Microbubble Size and Shell Properties.
Zalloum IO; Jafari Sojahrood A; Paknahad AA; Kolios MC; Tsai SSH; Karshafian R
Langmuir; 2023 Dec; 39(49):17622-17631. PubMed ID: 38016673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microfluidic nanobubbles: observations of a sudden contraction of microbubbles into nanobubbles.
Paknahad AA; Zalloum IO; Karshafian R; Kolios MC; Tsai SSH
Soft Matter; 2023 Jul; 19(27):5142-5149. PubMed ID: 37386867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig.
Helbert A; Gaud E; Segers T; Botteron C; Frinking P; Jeannot V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3339-3352. PubMed ID: 33008649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Post-Formation Shrinkage and Stabilization of Microfluidic Bubbles in Lipid Solution.
Shih R; Lee AP
Langmuir; 2016 Mar; 32(8):1939-46. PubMed ID: 26820229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging.
Hettiarachchi K; Talu E; Longo ML; Dayton PA; Lee AP
Lab Chip; 2007 Apr; 7(4):463-8. PubMed ID: 17389962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T-Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation.
Khan AH; Jiang X; Kaushik A; Nair HS; Edirisinghe M; Mercado-Shekhar KP; Shekhar H; Dalvi SV
Langmuir; 2022 Aug; 38(33):10288-10304. PubMed ID: 35943351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel technology: microfluidic devices for microbubble ultrasound contrast agent generation.
Lin H; Chen J; Chen C
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Sep; 54(9):1317-30. PubMed ID: 27016369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Engineering Theranostic Microbubbles Using Microfluidics for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy: A Review.
Pulsipher KW; Hammer DA; Lee D; Sehgal CM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2441-2460. PubMed ID: 30241729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Freeze-Dried Microfluidic Monodisperse Microbubbles as a New Generation of Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Soysal U; Azevedo PN; Bureau F; Aubry A; Carvalho MS; Pessoa ACSN; Torre LG; Couture O; Tourin A; Fink M; Tabeling P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1484-1495. PubMed ID: 35568594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid shrinkage of lipid-coated bubbles in pulsed ultrasound.
Cox DJ; Thomas JL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Mar; 39(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 23245826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved Sensitivity of Ultrasound-Based Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation Using Monodisperse Microbubbles.
van Hoeve W; de Vargas Serrano M; Te Winkel L; Forsberg F; Dave JK; Sarkar K; Wessner CE; Eisenbrey JR
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jul; 41(7):1781-1789. PubMed ID: 34724241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liquid Flooded Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Device for in situ Generation of Monodisperse Microbubbles.
Dhanaliwala AH; Chen JL; Wang S; Hossack JA
Microfluid Nanofluidics; 2013 Mar; 14(3-4):457-467. PubMed ID: 23439786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction.
Chomas JE; Dayton P; Allen J; Morgan K; Ferrara KW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Jan; 48(1):232-48. PubMed ID: 11367791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic characterization of monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles: relationship between size and shell viscoelastic properties.
Parrales MA; Fernandez JM; Perez-Saborid M; Kopechek JA; Porter TM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1077. PubMed ID: 25190383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dependence of sonoporation efficiency on microbubble size: An in vitro monodisperse microbubble study.
van Elburg B; Deprez J; van den Broek M; De Smedt SC; Versluis M; Lajoinie G; Lentacker I; Segers T
J Control Release; 2023 Nov; 363():747-755. PubMed ID: 37778466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controllable Formation of Monodisperse Polymer Microbubbles as Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Song R; Peng C; Xu X; Wang J; Yu M; Hou Y; Zou R; Yao S
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 May; 10(17):14312-14320. PubMed ID: 29637761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
