BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36260609)

  • 1. Investigating the impact of eating norms and collective autonomy support vs. collective control on unhealthy eating and its internalization.
    Kadhim N; Amiot CE
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276162. PubMed ID: 36260609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's conformity to social norms to eat healthy: A developmental perspective.
    Hang H; Davies I; Schüring J
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Jan; 244():112666. PubMed ID: 31722276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why are they eco-friendly? Attributing eco-friendly descriptive norms to intrinsic motivation increases pro-environmental purchase intention.
    Ejelöv E; Bergquist M; Hansla A; Nilsson A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0265839. PubMed ID: 36264867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social norms shift behavioral and neural responses to foods.
    Nook EC; Zaki J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 27(7):1412-26. PubMed ID: 25671502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "I'll eat meat because that's what we do": The role of national norms and national social identification on meat eating.
    Nguyen A; Platow MJ
    Appetite; 2021 Sep; 164():105287. PubMed ID: 33930496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Don't tell me what I should do, but what others do: the influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents.
    Stok FM; de Ridder DT; de Vet E; de Wit JB
    Br J Health Psychol; 2014 Feb; 19(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 23406475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eating for Two? Protocol of an Exploratory Survey and Experimental Study on Social Norms and Norm-Based Messages Influencing European Pregnant and Non-pregnant Women's Eating Behavior.
    Bevelander KE; Herte K; Kakoulakis C; Sanguino I; Tebbe AL; Tünte MR
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():658. PubMed ID: 29867640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying social norms in physical aspects of food environments: A photo study.
    Raghoebar S; van Rongen S; Lie R; de Vet E
    Appetite; 2019 Dec; 143():104414. PubMed ID: 31445992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of social norms on anticipated snacking: An experimental study comparing different types of social norms.
    Mollen S; Cheung Q; Stok FM
    Appetite; 2023 Jan; 180():106372. PubMed ID: 36402412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The persistence of and resistance to social norms regarding the appropriate amount to Eat: A preliminary investigation.
    Feeney JR; Pliner P; Polivy J; Herman CP
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():93-99. PubMed ID: 27890473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can intergroup behaviors be emitted out of self-determined reasons? Testing the role of group norms and behavioral congruence in the internalization of discrimination and parity behaviors.
    Amiot CE; Sansfaçon S; Louis WR; Yelle M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Jan; 38(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 22109251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Healthy cravings? Impact of imagined healthy food consumption on craving for healthy foods and motivation to eat healthily - Results of an initial experimental study.
    Werthmann J; Tuschen-Caffier B; Ströbele L; Kübel SL; Renner F
    Appetite; 2023 Apr; 183():106458. PubMed ID: 36638961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Injunctive norms as social pressures: Does autonomy support moderate the relationship between injunctive norms and autonomy satisfaction in physical activity?
    Kim J; Eys M; Robertson-Wilson J
    Psychol Health; 2024 May; 39(5):594-612. PubMed ID: 35757927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychological Pathways Through Which Social Norms and Social Identity Influence Eating Behavior: Testing a Conceptual Model.
    Derricks V; Earl A; Carmichael AG; Jayaratne TE
    Int J Behav Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 35286584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing Tailored Communications for Health Risk Assessment: A Randomized Factorial Experiment of the Effects of Expectancy Priming, Autonomy Support, and Exemplification.
    Valle CG; Queen TL; Martin BA; Ribisl KM; Mayer DK; Tate DF
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e63. PubMed ID: 29496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misperceived eating norms: Assessing pluralistic ignorance in the food environment.
    Moojen R; Gillebaart M; de Ridder D
    Appetite; 2022 Dec; 179():106284. PubMed ID: 36049572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Autonomy-Framed and Control-Framed Implementation Intentions on Snacking Behaviour: The Moderating Effect of Eating Self-Efficacy.
    Churchill S; Pavey L; Sparks P
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2019 Mar; 11(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 30302915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Healthy and unhealthy social norms and food selection. Findings from a field-experiment.
    Mollen S; Rimal RN; Ruiter RA; Kok G
    Appetite; 2013 Jun; 65():83-9. PubMed ID: 23402712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When planning is not enough: the self-regulatory effect of implementation intentions on changing snacking habits.
    Tam L; Bagozzi RP; Spanjol J
    Health Psychol; 2010 May; 29(3):284-292. PubMed ID: 20496982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Psychological Science Accelerator Self-Determination Theory Collaboration
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 May; 119(22):e2111091119. PubMed ID: 35622891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.