These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36262037)

  • 1. Clinically Adjudicated Reference Standards for Evaluation of Infectious Diseases Diagnostics.
    Patel R; Tsalik EL; Evans S; Fowler VG; Doernberg SB;
    Clin Infect Dis; 2023 Mar; 76(5):938-943. PubMed ID: 36262037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian latent class analysis when the reference test is imperfect.
    Cheung A; Dufour S; Jones G; Kostoulas P; Stevenson MA; Singanallur NB; Firestone SM
    Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):271-286. PubMed ID: 34140724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
    Collins J; Huynh M
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual composite reference standards (dCRS) in molecular diagnostic research: A new approach to reduce bias in the presence of Imperfect reference.
    Tang S; Hemyari P; Canchola JA; Duncan J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):951-965. PubMed ID: 29355450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
    Valenstein PN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A guide to aid the selection of diagnostic tests.
    Kosack CS; Page AL; Klatser PR
    Bull World Health Organ; 2017 Sep; 95(9):639-645. PubMed ID: 28867844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review on the diagnosis of pediatric bacterial pneumonia: when gold is bronze.
    Lynch T; Bialy L; Kellner JD; Osmond MH; Klassen TP; Durec T; Leicht R; Johnson DW
    PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e11989. PubMed ID: 20700510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
    Asselineau J; Paye A; Bessède E; Perez P; Proust-Lima C
    Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.
    Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson K; Graziadio S; Vale L; Allen AJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223832. PubMed ID: 31603953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
    Storey HL; Huang Y; Crudder C; Golden A; de los Santos T; Hawkins K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142364. PubMed ID: 26566275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
    de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods.
    Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson KJ; Allen AJ; Vale L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33845775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnson WO; Jones G; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jun; 167():113-127. PubMed ID: 31027713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design, statistical analysis and reporting standards for test accuracy studies for infectious diseases in animals: Progress, challenges and recommendations.
    Gardner IA; Colling A; Greiner M
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jan; 162():46-55. PubMed ID: 30621898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
    Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.
    Kostoulas P; Nielsen SS; Branscum AJ; Johnson WO; Dendukuri N; Dhand NK; Toft N; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Mar; 138():37-47. PubMed ID: 28237234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.