These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36262525)

  • 1. An Empirical Identification Issue of the Bifactor Item Response Theory Model.
    Chen W; Fujimoto KA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Nov; 46(8):675-689. PubMed ID: 36262525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis.
    Cai L; Yang JS; Hansen M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):221-48. PubMed ID: 21534682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model.
    Seo DG; Weiss DJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Dec; 75(6):954-978. PubMed ID: 29795848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparison of the Separate and Concurrent Calibration Methods for the Full-Information Bifactor model.
    Kim KY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):512-526. PubMed ID: 31534287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Optimal Design of Bifactor Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing with Mixed-format Items.
    Mao X; Zhang J; Xin T
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 46(7):605-621. PubMed ID: 36131843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting Valid and Reliable Overall Scores and Domain Scores Using Bi-Factor Model.
    Liu Y; Li Z; Liu H
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):562-576. PubMed ID: 31534290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Auxiliary Item Information in the Item Parameter Estimation of a Graded Response Model for a Small to Medium Sample Size: Empirical Versus Hierarchical Bayes Estimation.
    Naveiras M; Cho SJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):478-495. PubMed ID: 38027461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximating Bifactor IRT True-Score Equating With a Projective Item Response Model.
    Kim KY; Cho UH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):215-218. PubMed ID: 32341608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The coexistence of coping resources and specific coping styles in stress: evidence from full information item bifactor analysis.
    Zhang J; Cui M; Wang W; Lu H; Wu Q; Zhu X; Miao D; Zhang Y; Feng X; Xiao W
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96451. PubMed ID: 24787952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disparity between General Symptom Relief and Remission Criteria in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): A Post-treatment Bifactor Item Response Theory Model.
    Anderson AE; Reise SP; Marder SR; Mansolf M; Han C; Bilder RM
    Innov Clin Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 14(11-12):41-53. PubMed ID: 29410936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multilevel Reliability Measures of Latent Scores Within an Item Response Theory Framework.
    Cho SJ; Shen J; Naveiras M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):856-881. PubMed ID: 31215245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample Size Requirements for Estimation of Item Parameters in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Jiang S; Wang C; Weiss DJ
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():109. PubMed ID: 26903916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full-information item bifactor model for mathematical ability assessment in Chinese compulsory education quality monitoring.
    Meng X; Yang T; Shi N; Xin T
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1049472. PubMed ID: 36578686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Item Response Theory True Score Equating for the Bifactor Model Under the Common-Item Nonequivalent Groups Design.
    Kim KY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):479-493. PubMed ID: 35991829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generalized Fiducial Inference for Logistic Graded Response Models.
    Liu Y; Hannig J
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):1097-1125. PubMed ID: 28224368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A flexible approach to modelling over-, under- and equidispersed count data in IRT: The Two-Parameter Conway-Maxwell-Poisson Model.
    Beisemann M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):411-443. PubMed ID: 35678959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring State and Trait Anxiety: An Application of Multidimensional Item Response Theory.
    Carlucci L; Innamorati M; Ree M; D'Ignazio G; Balsamo M
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37622768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of Dimension Reduction to CAT Item Selection Under the Bifactor Model.
    Mao X; Zhang J; Xin T
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Sep; 43(6):419-434. PubMed ID: 31452552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of Reliable and Valid Negative Mood Screening Tools for Orthopaedic Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain.
    Lentz TA; Kallen MA; Deutscher D; George SZ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Feb; 480(2):313-324. PubMed ID: 34878414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.