170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36262791)
1. Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy: A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial.
Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Bossuyt PM; van Kaam AH; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2022 Dec; 16():100165. PubMed ID: 36262791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: An English national cohort study.
Knight HE; Cromwell DA; Gurol-Urganci I; Harron K; van der Meulen JH; Smith GCS
PLoS Med; 2017 Nov; 14(11):e1002425. PubMed ID: 29136007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does induction of labor at 41 weeks (early, mid or late) improve birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancy? A nationwide propensity score-matched study.
Ravelli ACJ; van der Post JAM; de Groot CJM; Abu-Hanna A; Eskes M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May; 102(5):612-625. PubMed ID: 36915238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review.
Keulen JKJ; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van der Post JAM; de Miranda E
Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():111-118. PubMed ID: 30170263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of induction of labour at 41 weeks and expectant management until 42 weeks in low risk women (INDEX trial).
Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Eekelen R; van Wely M; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van de Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2023 Mar; 17():100178. PubMed ID: 36755905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Alkmark M; Keulen JKJ; Kortekaas JC; Bergh C; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Hagberg H; Mol BW; Molin M; van der Post JAM; Saltvedt S; Wikström AK; Wennerholm UB; de Miranda E
PLoS Med; 2020 Dec; 17(12):e1003436. PubMed ID: 33290410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.
Bernardes TP; Broekhuijsen K; Koopmans CM; Boers KE; van Wyk L; Tajik P; van Pampus MG; Scherjon SA; Mol BW; Franssen MT; van den Berg PP; Groen H
BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1501-8. PubMed ID: 27173131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants.
Biesty LM; Egan AM; Dunne F; Dempsey E; Meskell P; Smith V; Ni Bhuinneain GM; Devane D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD012910. PubMed ID: 29303230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Grobman WA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week - 42 week dilemma.
Kortekaas JC; Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Dillen J; Oudijk MA; Zwart JJ; Bakker JJ; de Bont D; Nieuwenhuijze M; Offerhaus PM; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche F; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():350. PubMed ID: 25338555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes.
Bond DM; Gordon A; Hyett J; de Vries B; Carberry AE; Morris J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 2015(11):CD009433. PubMed ID: 26599471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.
Bond DM; Middleton P; Levett KM; van der Ham DP; Crowther CA; Buchanan SL; Morris J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 3(3):CD004735. PubMed ID: 28257562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial.
Walker KF; Bugg G; Macpherson M; McCormick C; Wildsmith C; Smith G; Thornton J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Dec; 12():145. PubMed ID: 23231750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT).
Boers KE; Vijgen SM; Bijlenga D; van der Post JA; Bekedam DJ; Kwee A; van der Salm PC; van Pampus MG; Spaanderman ME; de Boer K; Duvekot JJ; Bremer HA; Hasaart TH; Delemarre FM; Bloemenkamp KW; van Meir CA; Willekes C; Wijnen EJ; Rijken M; le Cessie S; Roumen FJ; Thornton JG; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Scherjon SA;
BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c7087. PubMed ID: 21177352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acute tocolysis for uterine tachysystole or suspected fetal distress.
Leathersich SJ; Vogel JP; Tran TS; Hofmeyr GJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(7):CD009770. PubMed ID: 29971813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.
Smith CA; Armour M; Dahlen HG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 10(10):CD002962. PubMed ID: 29036756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
