These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36263419)

  • 1. A machine learning approach for missing persons cases with high genotyping errors.
    Huang M; Liu M; Li H; King J; Smuts A; Budowle B; Ge J
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():971242. PubMed ID: 36263419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practical forensic use of kinship determination using high-density SNP profiling based on a microarray platform, focusing on low-quantity DNA.
    Yagasaki K; Mabuchi A; Higashino T; Hao Wong J; Nishida N; Fujimoto A; Tokunaga K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102752. PubMed ID: 35987117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the Impact of Dropout and Genotyping Error on SNP-Based Kinship Analysis With Forensic Samples.
    Turner SD; Nagraj VP; Scholz M; Jessa S; Acevedo C; Ge J; Woerner AE; Budowle B
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():882268. PubMed ID: 35846115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of SNP microarray analysis of compromised DNA on kinship classification success in the context of investigative genetic genealogy.
    de Vries JH; Kling D; Vidaki A; Arp P; Kalamara V; Verbiest MMPJ; Piniewska-Róg D; Parsons TJ; Uitterlinden AG; Kayser M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102625. PubMed ID: 34753062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast and accurate kinship estimation using sparse SNPs in relatively large database searches.
    Snedecor J; Fennell T; Stadick S; Homer N; Antunes J; Stephens K; Holt C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102769. PubMed ID: 36087514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SNPs as Supplements in Simple Kinship Analysis or as Core Markers in Distant Pairwise Relationship Tests: When Do SNPs Add Value or Replace Well-Established and Powerful STR Tests?
    Phillips C; García-Magariños M; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Transfus Med Hemother; 2012 Jun; 39(3):202-210. PubMed ID: 22851936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigative genetic genealogy - new approach to detect relatedness of individuals.
    Marie K; Halina Š; Vlastimil S
    Soud Lek; 2021; 66(4):58-65. PubMed ID: 35042349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whole-genome sequencing of human remains to enable genealogy DNA database searches - A case report.
    Tillmar A; Sjölund P; Lundqvist B; Klippmark T; Älgenäs C; Green H
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102233. PubMed ID: 31981902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First-degree relationships and genotyping errors deciphered by a high-density SNP array in a Duroc × Iberian pig cross.
    Gomez-Raya L; Gómez Izquierdo E; de Mercado de la Peña E; Garcia-Ruiz F; Rauw WM
    BMC Genom Data; 2022 Feb; 23(1):14. PubMed ID: 35177001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of SNPs with low minor allele frequencies in missing person identification (MPI) through kinship analysis of DNA mixtures.
    Zhang N; Shi S; Lin S; Bai Z; Ling X; Gao J; Yan R; Ou X
    Electrophoresis; 2023 Oct; 44(19-20):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 37454302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple SNP-based minimal marker genotyping for Humulus lupulus L. identification and variety validation.
    Henning JA; Coggins J; Peterson M
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Oct; 8():542. PubMed ID: 26438052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.
    Grashei KE; Ødegård J; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):26. PubMed ID: 29776335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotyping-by-sequencing for estimating relatedness in nonmodel organisms: Avoiding the trap of precise bias.
    Attard CRM; Beheregaray LB; Möller LM
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):381-390. PubMed ID: 29160928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.
    Torkamaneh D; Belzile F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131533. PubMed ID: 26161900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genotyping errors, pedigree errors, and missing data.
    Hinrichs AL; Suarez BK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S120-4. PubMed ID: 16342180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of genotyping error in model-free linkage analysis using microsatellite or single-nucleotide polymorphism marker maps.
    Thompson CL; Baechle D; Lu Q; Mathew G; Song Y; Iyengar SK; Gray-McGuire C; Goddard KA
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S153. PubMed ID: 16451614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
    Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
    BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Triallelic single nucleotide polymorphisms and genotyping error in genetic epidemiology studies: MDR1 (ABCB1) G2677/T/A as an example.
    Hüebner C; Petermann I; Browning BL; Shelling AN; Ferguson LR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(6):1185-92. PubMed ID: 17548683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for genotyping errors in tagging SNP selection.
    Liu W; Yang T; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 71(Pt 4):467-79. PubMed ID: 17346256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.