132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36263559)
1. Diagnostic performance of quantitative signal intensity measurements on magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing cerebellopontine angle meningioma from acoustic schwannoma.
Nguyen DH; Le TD; Nguyen DM; Nguyen HK; Ngo QD; Duong DH; Nguyen MD
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Oct; 26(19):7115-7124. PubMed ID: 36263559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiological indeterminate vestibular schwannoma and meningioma in cerebellopontine angle area: differentiating using whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient.
Xu XQ; Li Y; Hong XN; Wu FY; Shi HB
Int J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 127(2):183-190. PubMed ID: 26961388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Susceptibility weighted imaging - a problem-solving tool in differentiation of cerebellopontine angle schwannomas and meningiomas.
Mishra A; Thomas B; Kapilamoorthy TR
Neuroradiol J; 2017 Jun; 30(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 28627983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating angiomatous meningioma from atypical meningioma.
Liu X; Wang Y; Wei J; Li S; Xue C; Deng J; Liu H; Sun Q; Zhang X; Zhou J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Oct; 221():107406. PubMed ID: 35932585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiating microcystic meningioma from atypical meningioma using diffusion-weighted imaging.
Xiaoai K; Qing Z; Lei H; Junlin Z
Neuroradiology; 2020 May; 62(5):601-607. PubMed ID: 31996968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging of Amide Proton Transfer Differentiates between Cerebellopontine Angle Schwannoma and Meningioma: Preliminary Results.
Koike H; Morikawa M; Ishimaru H; Ideguchi R; Uetani M; Hiu T; Matsuo T; Miyoshi M
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 36077581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiating atypical meningioma from anaplastic meningioma using diffusion weighted imaging.
Han T; Zhang J; Liu X; Zhang B; Deng L; Lin X; Jing M; Zhou J
Clin Imaging; 2022 Feb; 82():237-243. PubMed ID: 34915318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from angiomatous meningioma.
He W; Xiao X; Li X; Guo Y; Guo L; Liu X; Xu Y; Zhou J; Wu Y
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 112():186-191. PubMed ID: 30777209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rare case of radiologically distinct but pathologically admixed vestibular schwannoma and meningioma in the cerebellopontine angle: A case report.
Verma SK; Kumar S; Deb P; Yadav KK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(4):1029. PubMed ID: 26881608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unusual imaging characteristics of cystic meningioma in cerebellopontine angle.
Adachi S; Yamashita K; Nakamizo A; Amano T; Momosaki S; Noguchi T
Neuroradiol J; 2022 Dec; 35(6):777-779. PubMed ID: 35503008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The radiological differentiation of acoustic neurinoma and meningioma occurring together in the cerebellopontine angle.
Wilms G; Plets C; Goossens L; Goffin J; Vanwambeke K
Neurosurgery; 1992 Mar; 30(3):443-5; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 1620314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneously occurring vestibular schwannoma and meningioma in the cerebellopontine angle: case report and literature review.
Izci Y; Secer HI; Gönül E; Ongürü O
Clin Neuropathol; 2007; 26(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 17907598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Synchronous Tumors of the Cerebellopontine Angle.
Graffeo CS; Perry A; Copeland WR; Giannini C; Neff BA; Driscoll CL; Link MJ
World Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 98():632-643. PubMed ID: 27836701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuroanaesthetic challenges in a pregnant patient with a huge cerebellopontine angle meningioma.
Yeap TB; Hamzah NA; Ismail MI; Ab Mukmin L
BMJ Case Rep; 2023 May; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 37156568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cerebellopontine angle and intracanalicular masses mimicking vestibular schwannomas.
Calzada AP; Go JL; Tschirhart DL; Brackmann DE; Schwartz MS
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 25226376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic value of using combined MR diffusion tensor imaging parameters to differentiate between low- and high-grade meningioma.
Aslan K; Gunbey HP; Tomak L; Incesu L
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1088):20180088. PubMed ID: 29770735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 proliferation index, progesterone-receptor status and various histopathological parameters, and its utility in predicting the high grade in meningiomas.
Bozdağ M; Er A; Ekmekçi S
Acta Radiol; 2021 Mar; 62(3):401-413. PubMed ID: 32397733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation Between Different ADC Fractions, Cell Count, Ki-67, Total Nucleic Areas and Average Nucleic Areas in Meningothelial Meningiomas.
Surov A; Caysa H; Wienke A; Spielmann RP; Fiedler E
Anticancer Res; 2015 Dec; 35(12):6841-6. PubMed ID: 26637905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR diffusion and dynamic-contrast enhanced imaging to distinguish meningioma, paraganglioma, and schwannoma in the cerebellopontine angle and jugular foramen.
Ota Y; Liao E; Capizzano AA; Yokota H; Baba A; Kurokawa R; Kurokawa M; Moritani T; Yoshii K; Srinivasan A
J Neuroimaging; 2022 May; 32(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 34936708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the natural history of meningiomas: a predictor of tumor growth.
Zhang R; Wang Z; Zheng H; Chen X; Chen H; Song Y; Liu Z; Xue Y; Lin L
J Neurosurg; 2024 Feb; 140(2):377-385. PubMed ID: 37877959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
