These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36264124)

  • 21. Two-phase differential expression analysis for single cell RNA-seq.
    Wu Z; Zhang Y; Stitzel ML; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 34(19):3340-3348. PubMed ID: 29688282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses under sparse dependence: Adaptive FDR controlling in microarray data.
    Biswas A; Chakraborty S; Baruah VJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 May; 31(5):917-927. PubMed ID: 35133933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. PROPER: comprehensive power evaluation for differential expression using RNA-seq.
    Wu H; Wang C; Wu Z
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):233-41. PubMed ID: 25273110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A classification approach for DNA methylation profiling with bisulfite next-generation sequencing data.
    Cheng L; Zhu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 30(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24273245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate.
    Scheid S; Spang R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2921-2. PubMed ID: 15817688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. QUBIC: a bioconductor package for qualitative biclustering analysis of gene co-expression data.
    Zhang Y; Xie J; Yang J; Fennell A; Zhang C; Ma Q
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):450-452. PubMed ID: 28172469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A note on the false discovery rate and inconsistent comparisons between experiments.
    Higdon R; van Belle G; Kolker E
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(10):1225-8. PubMed ID: 18424815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robust and sparse correlation matrix estimation for the analysis of high-dimensional genomics data.
    Serra A; Coretto P; Fratello M; Tagliaferri R; Stegle O
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 29040390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficient RNA isoform identification and quantification from RNA-Seq data with network flows.
    Bernard E; Jacob L; Mairal J; Vert JP
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):2447-55. PubMed ID: 24813214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. LPEseq: Local-Pooled-Error Test for RNA Sequencing Experiments with a Small Number of Replicates.
    Gim J; Won S; Park T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0159182. PubMed ID: 27532300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MatchMixeR: a cross-platform normalization method for gene expression data integration.
    Zhang S; Shao J; Yu D; Qiu X; Zhang J
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(8):2486-2491. PubMed ID: 31904810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A space and time-efficient index for the compacted colored de Bruijn graph.
    Almodaresi F; Sarkar H; Srivastava A; Patro R
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):i169-i177. PubMed ID: 29949982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. chipPCR: an R package to pre-process raw data of amplification curves.
    Rödiger S; Burdukiewicz M; Schierack P
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2900-2. PubMed ID: 25913204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Co-expression analysis of high-throughput transcriptome sequencing data with Poisson mixture models.
    Rau A; Maugis-Rabusseau C; Martin-Magniette ML; Celeux G
    Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 31(9):1420-7. PubMed ID: 25563332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An efficient concordant integrative analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression data sets.
    Lai Y; Zhang F; Nayak TK; Modarres R; Lee NH; McCaffrey TA
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 33(23):3852-3860. PubMed ID: 28174897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. stageR: a general stage-wise method for controlling the gene-level false discovery rate in differential expression and differential transcript usage.
    Van den Berge K; Soneson C; Robinson MD; Clement L
    Genome Biol; 2017 Aug; 18(1):151. PubMed ID: 28784146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spectral clustering based on learning similarity matrix.
    Park S; Zhao H
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 34(12):2069-2076. PubMed ID: 29432517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.