These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36264177)

  • 1. Comparison of pain score between Foleys catheter and Leich-Wilkinson cannula in hysterosalpingography by numerical rating scale - A randomized control trial.
    Saini A; Ghuman NK; Raikar S; Bhati M; Singh P
    Health Care Women Int; 2023 Apr; 44(4):487-495. PubMed ID: 36264177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perfecting hysterosalpingography: Limitations to the use of disposable balloon catheter and its solution.
    Youssef Y; Raju R; Sanya R; Abuzeid O; Hebert J; Abuzeid M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 158(3):736-741. PubMed ID: 35084737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple and relatively painless technique for hysterosalpingography, using a thin catheter and closing the cervix with the vaginal speculum: a pilot study.
    Mansour R; Nada A; El-Khayat W; Abdel-Hak A; Inany H
    Postgrad Med J; 2011 Jul; 87(1029):468-71. PubMed ID: 21586792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of pain during hysterosalpingography with the use of balloon catheter vs metal cannula.
    Kiykac Altinbas S; Dilbaz B; Zengin T; Kilic S; Cakir L; Sengul O; Dede S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Feb; 35(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 25141095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hysterosalpingography with a balloon catheter versus a metal cannula: a prospective, randomized, blinded comparative study.
    Tur-Kaspa I; Seidman DS; Soriano D; Greenberg I; Dor J; Bider D
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Jan; 13(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 9512232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study.
    Volondat M; Fontas E; Delotte J; Fatfouta I; Chevallier P; Chassang M
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):501-508. PubMed ID: 29974219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dreyer K; Out R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can hysterosalpingo-foam sonography replace hysterosalpingography as first-choice tubal patency test? A randomized non-inferiority trial.
    van Welie N; van Rijswijk J; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Traas MAF; van Peperstraten AM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; Lambeek AF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Tros R; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 35220432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When a balloon catheter or tenaculum is required for cervical traction during hysterosalpingography.
    Kılıç KK; Gürses C; Karadağ C; Sözel YK; Özdemir Ö
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2171777. PubMed ID: 36708520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysterosalpingography -- a Malaysian experience.
    Arumugam K; Ng Kwee Boon
    Malays J Reprod Health; 1987 Dec; 5(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 12315186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between X-ray-hysterosalpingography and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography in the assessment of the tubal patency in the cause of female infertility.
    Pace C; Argirò R; Casadei L; Cesareni M; Orlacchio A
    Radiol Med; 2022 Dec; 127(12):1373-1382. PubMed ID: 36167884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women.
    Winter L; Glücker T; Steimann S; Fröhlich JM; Steinbrich W; De Geyter C; Pegios W
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 20482222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cost-effectiveness of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy versus hysterosalpingography in the work-up for subfertility.
    van Kessel MA; Pham CT; Tros R; Oosterhuis GJE; Kuchenbecker WKH; Bongers MY; Mol BWJ; Koks CAM
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2768-2776. PubMed ID: 36223599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography.
    Socolov D; Boian I; Boiculese L; Tamba B; Anghelache-Lupascu I; Socolov R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Dec; 111(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 20850745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; Kleiman-Broeze KA; Traas MAF; Muijsers GJJM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; van Oostwaard MF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Peters HE; Lier MCI; Lambalk CB; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Stoker J; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
    Ma L; Wu G; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang J; Li L; Zhou W
    J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography; a new, low invasive, radiation-free and less painful radiological approach to female infertility.
    Unterweger M; De Geyter C; Fröhlich JM; Bongartz G; Wiesner W
    Hum Reprod; 2002 Dec; 17(12):3138-41. PubMed ID: 12456613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy versus hysterosalpingography to diagnose tubal pathology in the work-up of subfertile women, a randomised clinical trial.
    Tros R; van Kessel MA; van Kuijk SMJ; Oosterhuis GJE; Kuchenbecker WKH; Kwee J; Bongers MY; Mol BWJ; Koks CAM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May; 236():127-132. PubMed ID: 30903885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fertility-related quality of life in subfertile women undergoing tubal testing with transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy or hysterosalpingography.
    van Kessel MA; Paulussen M; Tros R; Bongers MY; Mol BWJ; Koks CAM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jul; 274():19-22. PubMed ID: 35561566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of time lapse for establishing distal tubal occlusion diagnosis during hysterosalpingography procedure performed by using water soluble contrast media.
    Kahyaoglu S; Yumusak OH; Kahyaoglu I; Kucukbas GN; Esercan A; Tasci Y
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2017 May; 80(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 27889460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.