124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36264467)
1. Will the substitution of capital for labor increase the use of chemical fertilizer in agriculture? Analysis based on provincial panel data in China.
Lei Z; Tu T; Li X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(8):21052-21071. PubMed ID: 36264467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial-temporal characteristics and driving factors of the chemical fertilizer supply/demand correlation network in China.
Qu H; Yin Y; Xing W; Wang W; Zhou C; Li J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(53):80532-80548. PubMed ID: 35718849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Driving factors of total-factor substitution efficiency of chemical fertilizer input and related environmental regulation policy: A case study of Zhejiang Province.
Yang J; Lin Y
Environ Pollut; 2020 Aug; 263(Pt B):114541. PubMed ID: 32289649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Agricultural Division of Labor on Fertilizer Reduction Application: Evidence from Western China.
Zhou S; Qing C; He J; Xu D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36900798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Social capital and the use of organic fertilizer: an empirical analysis of Hubei Province in China.
Yang Y; He Y; Li Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(13):15211-15222. PubMed ID: 32072416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Financial Support for Agriculture, Chemical Fertilizer Use, and Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Production in China.
Guo L; Guo S; Tang M; Su M; Li H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 35742399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatiotemporal Changes of Chemical Fertilizer Application and Its Environmental Risks in China from 2000 to 2019.
Guo Y; Wang J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effective supply of eco-product and its influence factors at provincial scale of China from the perspective of supply-side reform.
Zheng J; Yu H
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2018 Oct; 29(10):3326-3336. PubMed ID: 30325158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impacts of Agricultural Capitalization on Regional Paddy Field Change: A Production-Factor Substitution Perspective.
Li X; Wang X; Song X
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33579028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote the Reduction in Chemical Fertilizer? Analysis Based on the Moderating Effect of Farm Size.
Chen X; Liu T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer.
Guo L; Li H; Cao X; Cao A; Huang M
J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 299():113621. PubMed ID: 34461463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the Heterogeneity Effect of Fertilizer Use Intensity on Agricultural Eco-Efficiency in China: Evidence from a Panel Quantile Regression Model.
Hou M; Xi Z; Zhao S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Life cycle assessment of potential environmental burden and human capital loss caused by apple production system in China.
Cheng J; Wang Q; Yu J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(22):62015-62031. PubMed ID: 36934186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic adjustment in agricultural practices to economic incentives aiming to decrease fertilizer application.
Sun S; Delgado MS; Sesmero JP
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jul; 177():192-201. PubMed ID: 27100331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are Socialized Services of Agricultural Green Production Conducive to the Reduction in Fertilizer Input? Empirical Evidence from Rural China.
Yang C; Zeng H; Zhang Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive Effects of Organic Substitution in Reduced-Fertilizer Regimes on Bacterial Diversity and N-Cycling Functionality in Greenhouse Ecosystem.
Sun N; Wang L; Sun Y; Li H; Liao S; Ding J; Wang G; Suo L; Li Y; Zou G; Huang S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fertilizer overuse in Chinese smallholders due to lack of fixed inputs.
Ren C; Jin S; Wu Y; Zhang B; Kanter D; Wu B; Xi X; Zhang X; Chen D; Xu J; Gu B
J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 293():112913. PubMed ID: 34091142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Internet use reduce chemical fertilizer use? Evidence from rural households in China.
Yuan F; Tang K; Shi Q
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(5):6005-6017. PubMed ID: 32979179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Spatial Correlation of Its Determinants in China: A Geographically Weighted Regression Approach.
Bai X; Zhang T; Tian S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(23):. PubMed ID: 33261075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial analysis of factors affecting fertilizer use efficiency in China: an empirical study based on geographical weighted regression model.
Bai X; Zhang T; Tian S; Wang Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(13):16663-16681. PubMed ID: 33389465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
