These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36265006)

  • 1. Deep mendelian randomization: Investigating the causal knowledge of genomic deep learning models.
    Malina S; Cizin D; Knowles DA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Oct; 18(10):e1009880. PubMed ID: 36265006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
    Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument.
    Freeman G; Cowling BJ; Schooling CM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1157-63. PubMed ID: 23934314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mendelian randomization suggests a bidirectional, causal relationship between physical inactivity and adiposity.
    Carrasquilla GD; García-Ureña M; Fall T; Sørensen TIA; Kilpeläinen TO
    Elife; 2022 Mar; 11():. PubMed ID: 35254260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
    Wang YZ; Shen HB
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1134-44. PubMed ID: 24062299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization.
    Davies NM; von Hinke Kessler Scholder S; Farbmacher H; Burgess S; Windmeijer F; Smith GD
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 25382280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 181(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 25632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for non-linear causal effects using a binary genotype in a Mendelian randomization study: application to alcohol and cardiovascular traits.
    Silverwood RJ; Holmes MV; Dale CE; Lawlor DA; Whittaker JC; Smith GD; Leon DA; Palmer T; Keating BJ; Zuccolo L; Casas JP; Dudbridge F;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 43(6):1781-90. PubMed ID: 25192829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
    Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caution against examining the role of reverse causality in Mendelian Randomization.
    Lutz SM; Wu AC; Hokanson JE; Vansteelandt S; Lange C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 45(5):445-454. PubMed ID: 34008876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets.
    Minelli C; Del Greco M F; van der Plaat DA; Bowden J; Sheehan NA; Thompson J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 50(5):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 33899104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
    Harbord RM; Didelez V; Palmer TM; Meng S; Sterne JA; Sheehan NA
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating causal associations between use of nicotine, alcohol, caffeine and cannabis: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
    Verweij KJH; Treur JL; Vink JM
    Addiction; 2018 Jul; 113(7):1333-1338. PubMed ID: 29334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Causal relationships between gut metabolites and Alzheimer's disease: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
    Zhuang Z; Gao M; Yang R; Liu Z; Cao W; Huang T
    Neurobiol Aging; 2021 Apr; 100():119.e15-119.e18. PubMed ID: 33280888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application of mendelian randomization methods in causal inference of observational study].
    Lin LJ; Wei YY; Zhang RY; Chen F
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 53(6):619-624. PubMed ID: 31177761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The bidirectional causal relationships of insomnia with five major psychiatric disorders: A Mendelian randomization study.
    Gao X; Meng LX; Ma KL; Liang J; Wang H; Gao Q; Wang T
    Eur Psychiatry; 2019 Aug; 60():79-85. PubMed ID: 31234011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.