These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36265398)

  • 21. Replication Fork Reversal and Protection.
    Qiu S; Jiang G; Cao L; Huang J
    Front Cell Dev Biol; 2021; 9():670392. PubMed ID: 34041245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):994-1003. PubMed ID: 17382606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rad53 limits CMG helicase uncoupling from DNA synthesis at replication forks.
    Devbhandari S; Remus D
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2020 May; 27(5):461-471. PubMed ID: 32341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork.
    Segurado M; Tercero JA
    Biol Cell; 2009 Aug; 101(11):617-27. PubMed ID: 19686094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Checkpoint responses to replication stalling: inducing tolerance and preventing mutagenesis.
    Kai M; Wang TS
    Mutat Res; 2003 Nov; 532(1-2):59-73. PubMed ID: 14643429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork.
    Calzada A; Hodgson B; Kanemaki M; Bueno A; Labib K
    Genes Dev; 2005 Aug; 19(16):1905-19. PubMed ID: 16103218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Termination of DNA replication forks: "Breaking up is hard to do".
    Bailey R; Priego Moreno S; Gambus A
    Nucleus; 2015; 6(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 25835602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.
    Patel DR; Weiss RS
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2018 Dec; 46(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 30514768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA.
    Iyer DR; Rhind N
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Aug; 13(8):e1006958. PubMed ID: 28806726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rad53 regulates replication fork restart after DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Szyjka SJ; Aparicio JG; Viggiani CJ; Knott S; Xu W; Tavaré S; Aparicio OM
    Genes Dev; 2008 Jul; 22(14):1906-20. PubMed ID: 18628397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. TT-pocket/HIRAN: binding to 3'-terminus of DNA for recognition and processing of stalled replication forks.
    Masai H
    J Biochem; 2022 Jul; 172(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 35662338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. ATR-like kinase Mec1 facilitates both chromatin accessibility at DNA replication forks and replication fork progression during replication stress.
    Rodriguez J; Tsukiyama T
    Genes Dev; 2013 Jan; 27(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 23307868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ongoing replication forks delay the nuclear envelope breakdown upon mitotic entry.
    Hashimoto Y; Tanaka H
    J Biol Chem; 2021; 296():100033. PubMed ID: 33148697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 14-3-3 Proteins regulate exonuclease 1-dependent processing of stalled replication forks.
    Engels K; Giannattasio M; Muzi-Falconi M; Lopes M; Ferrari S
    PLoS Genet; 2011 Apr; 7(4):e1001367. PubMed ID: 21533173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stalled replication forks generate a distinct mutational signature in yeast.
    Larsen NB; Liberti SE; Vogel I; Jørgensen SW; Hickson ID; Mankouri HW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):9665-9670. PubMed ID: 28827358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cohesin dynamic association to chromatin and interfacing with replication forks in genome integrity maintenance.
    Villa-Hernández S; Bermejo R
    Curr Genet; 2018 Oct; 64(5):1005-1013. PubMed ID: 29549581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork.
    Paulsen RD; Cimprich KA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):953-66. PubMed ID: 17531546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A DNA replication fork-centric view of the budding yeast DNA damage response.
    McClure AW; Canal B; Diffley JFX
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2022 Nov; 119():103393. PubMed ID: 36108423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Orchestration of the S-phase and DNA damage checkpoint pathways by replication forks from early origins.
    Caldwell JM; Chen Y; Schollaert KL; Theis JF; Babcock GF; Newlon CS; Sanchez Y
    J Cell Biol; 2008 Mar; 180(6):1073-86. PubMed ID: 18347065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The DNA damage response during DNA replication.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):568-75. PubMed ID: 16226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.