182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36265519)
1. The clinical meaning of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve for the evaluation of the performance of disease markers.
Parodi S; Verda D; Bagnasco F; Muselli M
Epidemiol Health; 2022; 44():e2022088. PubMed ID: 36265519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restricted ROC curves are useful tools to evaluate the performance of tumour markers.
Parodi S; Muselli M; Carlini B; Fontana V; Haupt R; Pistoia V; Corrias MV
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):294-314. PubMed ID: 22735161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests.
Ma H; Bandos AI; Gur D
Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):304-20. PubMed ID: 25537143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach.
Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S
Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 25599932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.
He H; Lyness JM; McDermott MP
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 18680124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The length of the receiver operating characteristic curve and the two cutoff Youden index within a robust framework for discovery, evaluation, and cutoff estimation in biomarker studies involving improper receiver operating characteristic curves.
Bantis LE; Tsimikas JV; Chambers GR; Capello M; Hanash S; Feng Z
Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(7):1767-1789. PubMed ID: 33530129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reflection on modern methods: Revisiting the area under the ROC Curve.
Janssens ACJW; Martens FK
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):1397-1403. PubMed ID: 31967640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):528-541. PubMed ID: 25228637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians.
Nahm FS
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2022 Feb; 75(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 35124947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value.
Çorbacıoğlu ŞK; Aksel G
Turk J Emerg Med; 2023; 23(4):195-198. PubMed ID: 38024184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small area estimation of receiver operating characteristic curves for ordinal data under stochastic ordering.
Jang EJ; Nandram B; Ko Y; Kim DH
Stat Med; 2020 May; 39(10):1514-1528. PubMed ID: 32017182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
Pan X; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The area under the generalized receiver-operating characteristic curve.
Martínez-Camblor P; Pérez-Fernández S; Díaz-Coto S
Int J Biostat; 2021 Mar; 18(1):293-306. PubMed ID: 33761578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new concordant partial AUC and partial c statistic for imbalanced data in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms.
Carrington AM; Fieguth PW; Qazi H; Holzinger A; Chen HH; Mayr F; Manuel DG
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 31906931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Verification of modified receiver-operating characteristic software using simulated rating data.
Shiraishi J; Fukuoka D; Iha R; Inada H; Tanaka R; Hara T
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 30244314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
