137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36265755)
1. Investigating the impact of offer frame manipulations on responders playing the ultimatum game.
Fabre EF; Rumiati R; Causse M; Mailliez M; Cacciari C; Lotto L
Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Dec; 182():129-141. PubMed ID: 36265755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
Zheng L; Guo X; Zhu L; Li J; Chen L; Dienes Z
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 10(3):461-6. PubMed ID: 24847114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of facial attractiveness and alleged personality traits on fairness decisions in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERPs.
Li T; Liang Z; Yuan Y; Sommer W; Li W
Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108809. PubMed ID: 38718883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Responders' Gender Stereotypes Modulate the Strategic Decision-Making of Proposers Playing the Ultimatum Game.
Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():12. PubMed ID: 26834684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.
Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intention affects fairness processing: Evidence from behavior and representational similarity analysis of event-related potential signals.
Xu Q; Hu J; Qin Y; Li G; Zhang X; Li P
Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Apr; 44(6):2451-2464. PubMed ID: 36749642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heartbeat and economic decisions: observing mental stress among proposers and responders in the ultimatum bargaining game.
Dulleck U; Schaffner M; Torgler B
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108218. PubMed ID: 25247817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impaired social cognition in schizophrenia during the Ultimatum Game: An EEG study.
Horat SK; Favre G; Prévot A; Ventura J; Herrmann FR; Gothuey I; Merlo MCG; Missonnier P
Schizophr Res; 2018 Feb; 192():308-316. PubMed ID: 28578921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Moral transgression modulates fairness considerations in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERP and EEG data.
Chen T; Tang R; Yang X; Peng M; Cai M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Jun; 188():1-11. PubMed ID: 36889599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shall I Show My Emotions? The Effects of Facial Expressions in the Ultimatum Game.
Ferracci S; Giuliani F; Brancucci A; Pietroni D
Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
van 't Wout M; Kahn RS; Sanfey AG; Aleman A
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(4):564-8. PubMed ID: 16489438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why do people reject unintended inequity? Responders' rejection in a truncated ultimatum game.
Ohmura Y; Yamagishi T
Psychol Rep; 2005 Apr; 96(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 15941131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of delay and social distance in the dictator and ultimatum games.
Osiński J; Karbowski A; Rusek J; Reinholz A
Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104513. PubMed ID: 34582937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
