These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36266370)

  • 21. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Reconstructive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Preexisting Subpectoral Implants: Implant-Sparing Mastectomy With Delayed Implant Exchange Versus Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction.
    Parabkaharan S; Melody M; Trotta R; Lleshi A; Sun W; Smith PD; Khakpour N; Dayicioglu D
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76 Suppl 4():S332-5. PubMed ID: 27187252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pre-Pectoral One-Stage Breast Reconstruction with Anterior Coverage Using Superior Anterior Biological Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) and Inferior Anterior Dermal Sling Support.
    Sisti A; Sadeghi P; Cuomo R; Alvarez SM
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Jul; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 35893107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction in Large Ptotic Breasts.
    Maruccia M; Elia R; Gurrado A; Moschetta M; Nacchiero E; Bolletta A; Testini M; Giudice G
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Jun; 44(3):664-672. PubMed ID: 31970455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction EvAluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Harvey KL; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033641. PubMed ID: 31988232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Subcutaneous implant breast reconstruction: Time to reconsider?
    Tasoulis MK; Iqbal FM; Cawthorn S; MacNeill F; Vidya R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1636-1646. PubMed ID: 28528191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Single stage, direct to implant pre-pectoral breast reconstruction.
    Jones G; Antony AK
    Gland Surg; 2019 Feb; 8(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 30842928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is Unilateral Implant or Autologous Breast Reconstruction Better in Obtaining Breast Symmetry?
    Cohen O; Small K; Lee C; Petruolo O; Karp N; Choi M
    Breast J; 2016; 22(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 26534828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evolution of the Surgical Technique for "Breast in a Day" Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Transitioning from Dual-Plane to Prepectoral Implant Placement.
    Antony AK; Poirier J; Madrigrano A; Kopkash KA; Robinson EC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun; 143(6):1547-1556. PubMed ID: 31136464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix and implant: Defining the risks and outcomes of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.
    Apte A; Walsh M; Balaji P; Khor B; Chandrasekharan S; Chakravorty A
    Surgeon; 2020 Aug; 18(4):202-207. PubMed ID: 31636037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique.
    Lee JS; Park E; Lee JH; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD; Jung TD
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Mar; 10(3):2520-2529. PubMed ID: 33691448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sub-muscular Reconstruction after NAC Sparing Mastectomy: Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction with Human ADM Versus Tissue Expander.
    Sgarzani R; Pasquali S; Buggi F; Tognali D; Marongiu F; Mingozzi M; Melandri D; Morselli PG; Curcio A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 33078212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction, a modern challenge in postmastectomy radiation planning.
    Mitchell MP; Wagner J; Butterworth J
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(3):153-156. PubMed ID: 29233522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.
    Toh U; Takenaka M; Iwakuma N; Akagi Y
    Surg Today; 2021 Jun; 51(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 33185799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Propensity-matched, longitudinal outcomes analysis of complications and cost: comparing abdominal free flaps and implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Fischer JP; Wes AM; Nelson JA; Basta M; Rohrbach JI; Wu LC; Serletti JM; Kovach SJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Aug; 219(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 24916480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Aesthetic and technical refinements in latissimus dorsi implant breast reconstruction: a 15-year experience.
    Pacella SJ; Vogel JE; Locke MB; Codner MA
    Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Feb; 31(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 21317117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Urban C; González E; Fornazari A; Berman G; Spautz C; Kuroda F; Furlan Anselmi K; Rabinovich I; Dória M; Nissen L; Schünemann E; Sobreiro B; Lima R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov; 150(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 35994351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
    Dyrberg DL; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
    Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 32041661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.
    Potter S; Chambers A; Govindajulu S; Sahu A; Warr R; Cawthorn S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 24011501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.
    McCarthy CM; Mehrara BJ; Riedel E; Davidge K; Hinson A; Disa JJ; Cordeiro PG; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jun; 121(6):1886-1892. PubMed ID: 18520873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.