These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36267606)

  • 1. Examining the effect of religiosity, moral disengagement, personal attribution, comprehension and proximity on juror decision making regarding insanity pleas.
    Tate B; Yelderman LA
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2022; 29(6):809-831. PubMed ID: 36267606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
    Jung S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Juror characteristics on trial: Investigating how psychopathic traits, rape attitudes, victimization experiences, and juror demographics influence decision-making in an intimate partner rape trial.
    Lilley C; Willmott D; Mojtahedi D
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1086026. PubMed ID: 36727087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Juror knowledge and attitudes regarding mental illness verdicts.
    Sloat LM; Frierson RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 15985664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
    Louden JE; Skeem JL
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
    Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual Differences Relate to Support for Insanity and Postpartum Depression Legal Defenses: The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement.
    Wood EF; Trescher SA; Miller MK; McDermott CM
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(2):219-236. PubMed ID: 31984017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On finding for defendants who plead insanity: the crucial impact of dispositional instructions and opportunity to deliberate.
    Wheatman SR; Shaffer DR
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 11419381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Putting negative attitudes on the agenda? Not Criminally Responsible Reform Act publicity and juror decision-making.
    Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; Zannella L
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):154-159. PubMed ID: 27720501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defendant mental illness and juror decision-making: A comparison of sample types.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():58-66. PubMed ID: 26314888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verdict spotting: investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors and verdict system in jurors.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Munro J; Lages M; Frumkin LA; Laybourn P; Brown D
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2022; 29(3):323-344. PubMed ID: 35898612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
    Crocker CB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.
    Devine K; Mojtahedi D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Racial bias in jury selection hurts mock jurors, not just defendants: Testing one potential intervention.
    Abramowitz K; Douglass AB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):153-168. PubMed ID: 36931855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What's in the Box? Punishment and Insanity in the Canadian Jury Deliberation Room.
    Yamamoto S; Maeder EM
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():689128. PubMed ID: 34276516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.