These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36267606)

  • 21. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attitudinal Predictors of Juror Decisions on Gender and Sexual Minority Defendants.
    Ringger CS
    J Homosex; 2021 Oct; 68(12):2047-2074. PubMed ID: 32069192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials.
    Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; McLaughlin KJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101536. PubMed ID: 32033700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of posttraumatic stress disorder to support an insanity defense.
    Appelbaum PS; Jick RZ; Grisso T; Givelber D; Silver E; Steadman HJ
    Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Feb; 150(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 8422072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Juror Decision Making in Acquaintance and Marital Rape: The Influence of Clothing, Alcohol, and Preexisting Stereotypical Attitudes.
    Osborn K; Davis JP; Button S; Foster J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Mar; 36(5-6):NP2675-NP2696. PubMed ID: 29629635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.
    Rendell JA; Huss MT; Jensen ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 20014145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Informing reform: The views of legal professionals on the unique aspects of Scottish Law.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Frumkin LA; Turner J
    Med Sci Law; 2021 Oct; 61(4):256-265. PubMed ID: 33596724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Religious characteristics and the death penalty.
    Miller MK; Hayward RD
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 17546480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating juror accuracy, juror ability, and the relationship between them.
    Park K
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):288-305. PubMed ID: 20658261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.
    Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex and race as factors affecting the attribution of insanity in a murder trial.
    McGlynn RP; Megas JC; Benson DH
    J Psychol; 1976 May; 93(1st Half):93-9. PubMed ID: 1003337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Canadian mock juror attitudes and decisions in domestic violence cases involving asian and white interracial and intraracial couples.
    Maeder EM; Mossière A; Cheung L
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Mar; 28(4):667-84. PubMed ID: 22929345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Comparison of Juror Decision Making in Race-Based and Sexual Orientation-Based Hate Crime Cases.
    Gamblin BW; Kehn A; Vanderzanden K; Ruthig JC; Jones KM; Long BL
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Apr; 36(7-8):3231-3256. PubMed ID: 29766757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A third verdict option: exploring the impact of the not proven verdict on mock juror decision making.
    Hope L; Greene E; Memon A; Gavisk M; Houston K
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 17703354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Moral foundations and juror verdict justifications.
    Yamamoto S; Maeder EM; Bailey L
    J Soc Psychol; 2024 Mar; 164(2):251-257. PubMed ID: 36682361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sexual harassment stories: testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation.
    Huntley JE; Costanzo M
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):29-51. PubMed ID: 12647466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mock jurors' awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity.
    Martschuk N; Sporer SL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):441-464. PubMed ID: 33071551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Plaintiff life-taking: the effect of mock juror attitudes toward suicide on assignment of negligence and damages in a civil suit.
    Worthington DL
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(5):715-30. PubMed ID: 15378597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.