BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36267796)

  • 1. Sources of bias for single-arm phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Jung SH
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Sep; 10(18):1037. PubMed ID: 36267796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical issues for design and analysis of single-arm multi-stage phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Jung SH
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 May; 42():9-17. PubMed ID: 25749311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal designs for phase II clinical trials with heterogeneous patient populations.
    Liu L; Cao S; Jung SH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Jan; 33(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 35793231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.
    Jacob L; Uvarova M; Boulet S; Begaj I; Chevret S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():67. PubMed ID: 27250349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stopping for efficacy in single-arm phase II clinical trials.
    Rahman R; Iftakhar Alam M
    J Appl Stat; 2022; 49(10):2447-2466. PubMed ID: 35757036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized phase II clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Sargent DJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):802-16. PubMed ID: 24697589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative evaluation of single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Pond GR; Abbasi S
    Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 21511687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying a phase II futility study design to therapeutic stroke trials.
    Palesch YY; Tilley BC; Sackett DL; Johnston KC; Woolson R
    Stroke; 2005 Nov; 36(11):2410-4. PubMed ID: 16224086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Tang H; Foster NR; Grothey A; Ansell SM; Goldberg RM; Sargent DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1936-41. PubMed ID: 20212253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A varying-stage adaptive phase II/III clinical trial design.
    Dong G
    Stat Med; 2014 Apr; 33(8):1272-87. PubMed ID: 24273128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical aspects of the TNK-S2B trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: an efficient, dose-adaptive, seamless phase II/III design.
    Levin B; Thompson JL; Chakraborty B; Levy G; MacArthur R; Haley EC
    Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 21737464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of the odds ratio from multi-stage randomized trials.
    Cao S; Jung SH
    Pharm Stat; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38462496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditionally unbiased estimation in phase II/III clinical trials with early stopping for futility.
    Kimani PK; Todd S; Stallard N
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(17):2893-910. PubMed ID: 23413228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian hierarchical monitoring design for phase II cancer clinical trials: Incorporating information on response duration into monitoring rules.
    Wang J; Ma J; Cai C; Daver N; Ning J
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(21):4629-4639. PubMed ID: 34101217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal two-stage log-rank test for randomized phase II clinical trials.
    Kwak M; Jung SH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(4):639-658. PubMed ID: 27050043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying the bias in the estimated treatment effect in randomized trials having interim analyses and a rule for early stopping for futility.
    Walter SD; Han H; Briel M; Guyatt GH
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(9):1506-1518. PubMed ID: 28183155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase II cancer clinical trials with heterogeneous patient populations.
    Jung SH; Chang MN; Kang SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):312-28. PubMed ID: 22251176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some design considerations incorporating early futility for single-arm clinical trials with time-to-event primary endpoints using Weibull distribution.
    Waleed M; He J; Phadnis MA
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):610-644. PubMed ID: 33565236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-stage seamless transition design from open-label single-arm to randomized double-arm clinical trials.
    Shi H; Yin G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):158-171. PubMed ID: 28034171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.