These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA prevalence in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance subcategories as defined by the original Bethesda 1991 and the new Bethesda 2001 Systems. Pirog EC; Erroll M; Harigopal M; Centeno BA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 May; 128(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 15086283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resolving ASCUS without recourse to HPV testing: manual reprocessing of residual automated liquid-based cytology (ALBC) material using manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC). Maksem JA; Bedrossian CW; Kurtycz D; Sewall S; Shalkham J; Dhanwada V; Lind H; Bibbo M; Weidmann J; Kane B; Shi Fu Y Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 16299747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does total manual rescreening of negative pap tests screened by the ThinPrep imaging system add any value? Martin EL; Michael CW; Bomeisl PE; Shyu S; Wasman JK Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Oct; 42(10):834-9. PubMed ID: 24554347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability among observers utilizing the CellSolutions BestCyte Cell Sorter imaging system for the assessment of urinary tract cytology specimens. Gelwan E; Zhang ML; Allison DB; Cowan ML; DeLuca J; Fite JJ; Wangsiricharoen S; Williamson B; Zhou A; VandenBussche CJ J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30929755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytology and high risk HPV testing in cervical cancer screening program: Outcome of 3-year follow-up in an academic institute. Yang J; Nolte FS; Chajewski OS; Lindsey KG; Houser PM; Pellicier J; Wang Q; Ehsani L Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Jan; 46(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 29048733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria. Thrall MJ; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB; McKeon DM; Miller L; Savik K; Gulbahce HE Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience Reviewing Digital Pap Tests using a Gallery of Images. Pantanowitz L; Harrington S J Pathol Inform; 2021; 12():7. PubMed ID: 34012711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic concordance between whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in cytopathology: A systematic review. Girolami I; Pantanowitz L; Marletta S; Brunelli M; Mescoli C; Parisi A; Barresi V; Parwani A; Neil D; Scarpa A; Rossi ED; Eccher A Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Jan; 128(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31600035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole Slide Imaging of Pap Cell Block Preparations versus Liquid-Based Thin-Layer Cervical Cytology: A Comparative Study Evaluating the Detection of Organisms and Nonneoplastic Findings. Tawfik O; Davis M; Dillon S; Tawfik L; Diaz FJ; Fan F Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(4):388-97. PubMed ID: 25033897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy. O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lack of transformation zone in cervical Pap tests, should it be a concern? A quality assurance initiative. Polanco Jacome EC; Maerki J; Chau K; Akerman M; Sajjan S; Klein M; Gimenez C; Laser A; Das K Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Jul; 46(7):584-588. PubMed ID: 29722175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of AI-assisted ThinPrep® Pap test screening using the Genius Cantley RL; Jing X; Smola B; Hao W; Harrington S; Pantanowitz L J Pathol Inform; 2024 Dec; 15():100391. PubMed ID: 39114431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Agreement in Whole Slide Digital Images of Cervical Cytology and Cell Blocks. Negri G; Tauber M; Pinamonti M; Golinelli L; Garofalo M; Vittadello F; Capitanio A Diagn Cytopathol; 2025 Jan; 53(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 39391891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the ThinPrep Imaging System increase the detection of high-risk HPV-positive ASC-US and AGUS? The Women and Infants Hospital experience with over 200,000 cervical cytology cases. Quddus MR; Neves T; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Sung CJ Cytojournal; 2009 Aug; 6():15. PubMed ID: 19826482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. P16INK4a as an adjunct marker in liquid-based cervical cytology. Sahebali S; Depuydt CE; Segers K; Moeneclaey LM; Vereecken AJ; Van Marck E; Bogers JJ Int J Cancer; 2004 Mar; 108(6):871-6. PubMed ID: 14712490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]