These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36269383)

  • 1. Sustained superiority in KOOS subscores after matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation using spheroids compared to microfracture.
    Hoburg A; Niemeyer P; Laute V; Zinser W; Becher C; Kolombe T; Fay J; Pietsch S; Kuźma T; Widuchowski W; Fickert S
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Jun; 31(6):2482-2493. PubMed ID: 36269383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III Noninferiority Trial to Compare the Clinical Efficacy of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Spheroid Technology Versus Arthroscopic Microfracture for Cartilage Defects of the Knee.
    Niemeyer P; Laute V; Zinser W; Becher C; Kolombe T; Fay J; Pietsch S; Kuźma T; Widuchowski W; Fickert S
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Jul; 7(7):2325967119854442. PubMed ID: 31317047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Yoon KH; Lee J; Park JY
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Feb; 52(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 38230875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Spheroid Technology Is Superior to Arthroscopic Microfracture at 36 Months Regarding Activities of Daily Living and Sporting Activities after Treatment.
    Hoburg A; Niemeyer P; Laute V; Zinser W; Becher C; Kolombe T; Fay J; Pietsch S; Kuźma T; Widuchowski W; Fickert S
    Cartilage; 2021 Dec; 13(1_suppl):437S-448S. PubMed ID: 31893951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Cell Dose on the Early Magnetic Resonance Morphological Outcomes of Autologous Cell Implantation for Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Niemeyer P; Laute V; John T; Becher C; Diehl P; Kolombe T; Fay J; Siebold R; Niks M; Fickert S; Zinser W
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Aug; 44(8):2005-14. PubMed ID: 27206690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NeoCart, an autologous cartilage tissue implant, compared with microfracture for treatment of distal femoral cartilage lesions: an FDA phase-II prospective, randomized clinical trial after two years.
    Crawford DC; DeBerardino TM; Williams RJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(11):979-89. PubMed ID: 22637204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arthroscopic Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation Versus Microfracture: A 6-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Ibarra C; Villalobos E; Madrazo-Ibarra A; Velasquillo C; Martinez-Lopez V; Izaguirre A; Olivos-Meza A; Cortes-Gonzalez S; Perez-Jimenez FJ; Vargas-Ramirez A; Franco-Sanchez G; Ibarra-Ibarra LG; Sierra-Suarez L; Almazan A; Ortega-Sanchez C; Trueba C; Martin FB; Arredondo-Valdes R; Chavez-Arias D
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Jul; 49(8):2165-2176. PubMed ID: 34048286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation versus Microfracture for Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Yoon KH; Yoo JD; Choi CH; Lee J; Lee JY; Kim SG; Park JY
    Cartilage; 2021 Dec; 13(1_suppl):1092S-1104S. PubMed ID: 32476445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is implantation of autologous chondrocytes superior to microfracture for articular-cartilage defects of the knee? A systematic review of 5-year follow-up data.
    Na Y; Shi Y; Liu W; Jia Y; Kong L; Zhang T; Han C; Ren Y
    Int J Surg; 2019 Aug; 68():56-62. PubMed ID: 31220632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Autologous chondrocyte implantation using the original periosteum-cover technique versus matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation: a randomized clinical trial.
    Zeifang F; Oberle D; Nierhoff C; Richter W; Moradi B; Schmitt H
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 May; 38(5):924-33. PubMed ID: 19966102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microfracture Versus Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Articular Cartilage Lesions in the Knee: A Systematic Review of 5-Year Outcomes.
    Kraeutler MJ; Belk JW; Purcell JM; McCarty EC
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Mar; 46(4):995-999. PubMed ID: 28423287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matrix-Applied Characterized Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes Versus Microfracture: Two-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Saris D; Price A; Widuchowski W; Bertrand-Marchand M; Caron J; Drogset JO; Emans P; Podskubka A; Tsuchida A; Kili S; Levine D; Brittberg M;
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jun; 42(6):1384-94. PubMed ID: 24714783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matrix-Applied Characterized Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes Versus Microfracture: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Brittberg M; Recker D; Ilgenfritz J; Saris DBF;
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 May; 46(6):1343-1351. PubMed ID: 29565642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells With Microfracture Versus Microfracture Alone: 2-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Koh YG; Kwon OR; Kim YS; Choi YJ; Tak DH
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Jan; 32(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 26585585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Good clinical and MRI outcome after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair in the knee.
    Siebold R; Suezer F; Schmitt B; Trattnig S; Essig M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Mar; 26(3):831-839. PubMed ID: 28258330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective Long-term Follow-up of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Periosteum Versus Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Barié A; Kruck P; Sorbi R; Rehnitz C; Oberle D; Walker T; Zeifang F; Moradi B
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jul; 48(9):2230-2241. PubMed ID: 32667270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Arthroscopic gel-type autologous chondrocyte implantation presents histologic evidence of regenerating hyaline-like cartilage in the knee with articular cartilage defect.
    Yoon TH; Jung M; Choi CH; Kim HS; Lee YH; Choi YS; Kim SJ; Kim SH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Mar; 28(3):941-951. PubMed ID: 31240378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Improves Knee-Specific Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescent Patients.
    Cvetanovich GL; Riboh JC; Tilton AK; Cole BJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Jan; 45(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27566240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marrow Stimulation Has Relatively Inferior Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cartilage Restoration Surgery of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Abraamyan T; Johnson AJ; Wiedrick J; Crawford DC
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Mar; 50(3):858-866. PubMed ID: 33890799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-Term Clinical and MRI Results of Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee.
    Kreuz PC; Kalkreuth RH; Niemeyer P; Uhl M; Erggelet C
    Cartilage; 2019 Jul; 10(3):305-313. PubMed ID: 29429373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.