These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36269482)

  • 1. Stochastic MCDM with normal approximation of the uniformly distributed variables for assessing sustainable insulation materials.
    Balezentis T; Streimikiene D; Siksnelyte-Butkiene I; Skulskis V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(8):21263-21276. PubMed ID: 36269482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
    Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SCORE: a novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation.
    Rosén L; Back PE; Söderqvist T; Norrman J; Brinkhoff P; Norberg T; Volchko Y; Norin M; Bergknut M; Döberl G
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():621-38. PubMed ID: 25594905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bimodal fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (BFAHP) for coronary heart disease risk assessment.
    Sabahi F
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jul; 83():204-216. PubMed ID: 29625186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The combined analysis of uncertainty and patient heterogeneity in medical decision models.
    Groot Koerkamp B; Stijnen T; Weinstein MC; Hunink MG
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(4):650-61. PubMed ID: 20974904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A scenario-based MCDA framework for wastewater infrastructure planning under uncertainty.
    Zheng J; Egger C; Lienert J
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):895-908. PubMed ID: 27666649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analyzing the Status of Sustainable Development in the Manufacturing Sector Using Multi-Expert Multi-Criteria Fuzzy Decision-Making and Integrated Triple Bottom Lines.
    Hendiani S; Liao H; Bagherpour M; Tvaronavičienė M; Banaitis A; Antucheviciene J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 32471107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty analysis of penicillin V production using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Biwer A; Griffith S; Cooney C
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Apr; 90(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 15742389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for both random errors and systematic errors in uncertainty propagation analysis of computer models involving experimental measurements with Monte Carlo methods.
    Vasquez VR; Whiting WB
    Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1669-81. PubMed ID: 16506991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
    Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Norm-dist Monte-Carlo integrative method for the improvement of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.
    Wicaksono FD; Arshad YB; Sihombing H
    Heliyon; 2020 Apr; 6(4):e03607. PubMed ID: 32346625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying uncertainty in medical decisions.
    Dittus RS; Roberts SD; Wilson JR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 14(3 Suppl A):23A-28A. PubMed ID: 2671098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of harvest and information needs for North American sea ducks.
    Koneff MD; Zimmerman GS; Dwyer CP; Fleming KK; Padding PI; Devers PK; Johnson FA; Runge MC; Roberts AJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175411. PubMed ID: 28419113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sustainable waste disposal technology selection: The stratified best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method.
    Torkayesh AE; Malmir B; Rajabi Asadabadi M
    Waste Manag; 2021 Mar; 122():100-112. PubMed ID: 33508530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainties in personal dosimetry for external radiation: a Monte Carlo approach.
    van Dijk JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17052989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo Methods for the Calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.
    Fang W; Wang Z; Giles MB; Jackson CH; Welton NJ; Andrieu C; Thom H
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 34231446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulated data for multi-criteria selection of city and compact electric vehicles in Poland.
    Ziemba P
    Data Brief; 2021 Jun; 36():107118. PubMed ID: 34041319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Weighing Clinical Evidence Using Patient Preferences: An Application of Probabilistic Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.
    Broekhuizen H; IJzerman MJ; Hauber AB; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Mar; 35(3):259-269. PubMed ID: 27832461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination.
    Baudrit C; Guyonnet D; Dubois D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):72-84. PubMed ID: 17321003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.