These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36270012)
1. Development of a candidate item bank for measuring mobility of lower limb orthosis users. Balkman GS; Morgan SJ; Amtmann D; Baylor C; Hafner BJ PM R; 2023 Apr; 15(4):445-455. PubMed ID: 36270012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mobility experiences of adult lower limb orthosis users: a focus group study. Balkman GS; Hafner BJ; Rosen RE; Morgan SJ Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(25):7904-7915. PubMed ID: 34807780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and initial validation of the Orthotic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Mobility (OPRO-M): An item bank for evaluating mobility of people who use lower-limb orthoses. Balkman GS; Bamer AM; Stevens PM; Weber EL; Morgan SJ; Salem R; Amtmann D; Hafner BJ PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293848. PubMed ID: 37917618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of an item bank for measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation: The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). Hafner BJ; Amtmann D; Morgan SJ; Abrahamson DC; Askew RL; Bamer AM; Salem R; Gaunaurd IA; Gailey RS; ; Czerniecki JM; Fatone S; Fergason JR; Fothergill I; Kelly VE; Weber EL; Whiteneck GG PM R; 2023 Apr; 15(4):456-473. PubMed ID: 36787171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification and analysis of knee-ankle-foot orthosis design requirements based on a feedback survey of orthosis users in India. Bapat GM; Sujatha S Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Jan; 14(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29265890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of cognitive interviews in the development of the PLUS-M item bank. Morgan SJ; Amtmann D; Abrahamson DC; Kajlich AJ; Hafner BJ Qual Life Res; 2014 Aug; 23(6):1767-75. PubMed ID: 24442531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mobility with a lower limb prosthesis: experiences of users with high levels of functional ability. Morgan SJ; Liljenquist KS; Kajlich A; Gailey RS; Amtmann D; Hafner BJ Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(13):3236-3244. PubMed ID: 33280454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterizing mobility from the prosthetic limb user's perspective: Use of focus groups to guide development of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility. Hafner BJ; Morgan SJ; Abrahamson DC; Amtmann D Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25944625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthotic management of instability of the knee related to neuromuscular and central nervous system disorders: systematic review, qualitative study, survey and costing analysis. O'Connor J; McCaughan D; McDaid C; Booth A; Fayter D; Rodriguez-Lopez R; Bowers R; Dyson L; Iglesias CP; Lalor S; O'Connor RJ; Phillips M; Ramdharry G Health Technol Assess; 2016 Jul; 20(55):1-262. PubMed ID: 27477023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing item banks to measure three important domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Singapore. Uy EJB; Xiao LYS; Xin X; Yeo JPT; Pua YH; Lee GL; Kwan YH; Teo EPS; Vaingankar JA; Subramaniam M; Chan MF; Kumar N; Ang ALC; Bautista DC; Cheung YB; Thumboo J Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 31898541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Japanese translation and linguistic validation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). Balkman GS; Samejima S; Fujimoto K; Hafner BJ Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Feb; 46(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 34693940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do current upper limb orthotic classification systems help clinicians choose and design effective orthoses? A scoping review with expert interviews. Farzad M; MacDermid J; Ferreira L; Szekeres M; Cuypers S; Shafiee E; J Hand Ther; 2024; 37(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 37778877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knee orthoses for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. Smith TO; Drew BT; Meek TH; Clark AB Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; 2015(12):CD010513. PubMed ID: 26645724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying content for the glaucoma-specific item bank to measure quality-of-life parameters. Khadka J; McAlinden C; Craig JE; Fenwick EK; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K J Glaucoma; 2015 Jan; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 23552836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A user-centered qualitative study on experiences with ankle-foot orthoses and suggestions for improved design. van der Wilk D; Hijmans JM; Postema K; Verkerke GJ Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Apr; 42(2):121-128. PubMed ID: 28100099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A functional comparison of conventional knee-ankle-foot orthoses and a microprocessor-controlled leg orthosis system based on biomechanical parameters. Schmalz T; Pröbsting E; Auberger R; Siewert G Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Apr; 40(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 25249381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Weight transfer analysis in adults with hemiplegia using ankle foot orthosis. Nolan KJ; Yarossi M Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Mar; 35(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 21515889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. User experience of lower-limb orthosis. Yang BS; Chen YW; Tong JR Assist Technol; 2018; 30(5):267-273. PubMed ID: 28598300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of relative motion orthoses from the perspective of hand-injured patients: A qualitative study. Arslan ÖB; Şahin Y; Sığırtmaç İC; Yildiz B; Ayhan E; Öksüz Ç J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):425-432. PubMed ID: 37037730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]