These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Using social media images to assess ecosystem services in a remote protected area in the Argentinean Andes. Rossi SD; Barros A; Walden-Schreiner C; Pickering C Ambio; 2020 Jun; 49(6):1146-1160. PubMed ID: 31606883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Where have all the people gone? Enhancing global conservation using night lights and social media. Levin N; Kark S; Crandall D Ecol Appl; 2015 Dec; 25(8):2153-67. PubMed ID: 26910946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Uses and Limitations of Social Media to Inform Visitor Use Management in Parks and Protected Areas: A Systematic Review. Wilkins EJ; Wood SA; Smith JW Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 67(1):120-132. PubMed ID: 33063153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inequality in access to cultural ecosystem services from protected areas in the Chilean biodiversity hotspot. Martinez-Harms MJ; Bryan BA; Wood SA; Fisher DM; Law E; Rhodes JR; Dobbs C; Biggs D; Wilson KA Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep; 636():1128-1138. PubMed ID: 29913575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do drivers of nature visitation vary spatially? The importance of context for understanding visitation of nature areas in Europe and North America. Gosal AS; Giannichi ML; Beckmann M; Comber A; Massenberg JR; Palliwoda J; Roddis P; Schägner JP; Wilson J; Ziv G Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 776():145190. PubMed ID: 33639459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cultural ecosystem services in European grasslands: A systematic review of threats. Pellaton R; Lellei-Kovács E; Báldi A Ambio; 2022 Dec; 51(12):2462-2477. PubMed ID: 35793012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of intensity and spatial patterns of public use in natural treatment systems using geotagged photos from social media. Ghermandi A Water Res; 2016 Nov; 105():297-304. PubMed ID: 27639054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mapping and assessment of recreational cultural ecosystem services supply and demand in Vilnius (Lithuania). Kalinauskas M; Bogdzevič K; Gomes E; Inácio M; Barcelo D; Zhao W; Pereira P Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 855():158590. PubMed ID: 36165823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people. Vallecillo S; La Notte A; Zulian G; Ferrini S; Maes J Ecol Modell; 2019 Jan; 392():196-211. PubMed ID: 31007344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. EMERGY-based environmental systems assessment of a multi-purpose temperate mixed-forest watershed of the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Tilley DR; Swank WT J Environ Manage; 2003 Nov; 69(3):213-27. PubMed ID: 14580723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Species richness alone does not predict cultural ecosystem service value. Graves RA; Pearson SM; Turner MG Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Apr; 114(14):3774-3779. PubMed ID: 28320953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Visualizing social-ecological intensities for management of recreation visitors in a multiuse system. DaRugna OA; Chizinski CJ; Pope KL; Powell LA; Kaemingk MA J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 304():114224. PubMed ID: 34883436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: a spatial analysis. Van Riper CJ; Kyle GT J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 145():374-84. PubMed ID: 25124790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Recent trends of forest cover change and ecosystem services in eastern upland region of Bangladesh. Ahammad R; Stacey N; Eddy IMS; Tomscha SA; Sunderland TCH Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 647():379-389. PubMed ID: 30086490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multiple successional pathways in human-modified tropical landscapes: new insights from forest succession, forest fragmentation and landscape ecology research. Arroyo-Rodríguez V; Melo FP; Martínez-Ramos M; Bongers F; Chazdon RL; Meave JA; Norden N; Santos BA; Leal IR; Tabarelli M Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Feb; 92(1):326-340. PubMed ID: 26537849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services. Ridding LE; Redhead JW; Oliver TH; Schmucki R; McGinlay J; Graves AR; Morris J; Bradbury RB; King H; Bullock JM J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():1145-1154. PubMed ID: 30029348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Benefits-based analysis of visitor use of Sorak-san National Park in Korea. Shin WS; Jaakson R; Kim EI Environ Manage; 2001 Sep; 28(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 11531242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of forest management systems on natural resource use and provision of ecosystem services in Tanzania. Strauch AM; Rurai MT; Almedom AM J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 180():35-44. PubMed ID: 27203700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]