These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36271175)

  • 1. Cox regression can be collapsible and Aalen regression can be non-collapsible.
    Samuelsen SO
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2023 Apr; 29(2):403-419. PubMed ID: 36271175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Note on the Noncollapsibility of Rate Differences and Rate Ratios.
    Sjölander A; Dahlqwist E; Zetterqvist J
    Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):356-9. PubMed ID: 26680297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A semiparametric Cox-Aalen transformation model with censored data.
    Ning X; Pan Y; Sun Y; Gilbert PB
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3111-3125. PubMed ID: 37403227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Mizon-Richard encompassing test for the Cox and Aalen additive hazards models.
    Martinussen T; Aalen OO; Scheike TH
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 17608786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of odds of concordance based on the Aalen additive model.
    Martinussen T; Pipper CB
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2013 Jan; 19(1):100-16. PubMed ID: 23104317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An additive hazards frailty model with semi-varying coefficients.
    Zhang Z; Wang X; Peng Y
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2022 Jan; 28(1):116-138. PubMed ID: 34820722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model.
    White IR; Royston P
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):1982-98. PubMed ID: 19452569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Aalen's additive and Cox proportional hazards models for breast cancer survival: analysis of population- based data from British Columbia, Canada.
    Abadi A; Saadat S; Yavari P; Bajdik C; Jalili P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3113-6. PubMed ID: 22393999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time-dependent covariates in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model.
    Fisher LD; Lin DY
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1999; 20():145-57. PubMed ID: 10352854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Cox-type regression model with change-points in the covariates.
    Jensen U; Lütkebohmert C
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Sep; 14(3):267-85. PubMed ID: 18224437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On adjustment for auxiliary covariates in additive hazard models for the analysis of randomized experiments.
    Vansteelandt S; Martinussen T; Tchetgen ET
    Biometrika; 2014 Mar; 101(1):237-244. PubMed ID: 28669998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes patients: an analysis based on competing risks Markov chains and additive regression models.
    Rosato R; Ciccone G; Bo S; Pagano GF; Merletti F; Gregori D
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 17518809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalence tests under the Cox-Aalen model and the partly Aalen model.
    Shen PS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Sep; 32(5):789-801. PubMed ID: 35171755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using fractional polynomials and restricted cubic splines to model non-proportional hazards or time-varying covariate effects in the Cox regression model.
    Austin PC; Fang J; Lee DS
    Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):612-624. PubMed ID: 34806210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What price semiparametric Cox regression?
    Jullum M; Hjort NL
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Jul; 25(3):406-438. PubMed ID: 30218417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of treatment effect under non-proportional hazards and conditionally independent censoring.
    Boyd AP; Kittelson JM; Gillen DL
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3504-15. PubMed ID: 22763957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of random survival forests in understanding the determinants of under-five child mortality in Uganda in the presence of covariates that satisfy the proportional and non-proportional hazards assumption.
    Nasejje JB; Mwambi H
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Sep; 10(1):459. PubMed ID: 28882171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On collapsibility and confounding bias in Cox and Aalen regression models.
    Martinussen T; Vansteelandt S
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2013 Jul; 19(3):279-96. PubMed ID: 23329123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On hazard ratio estimators by proportional hazards models in matched-pair cohort studies.
    Shinozaki T; Mansournia MA; Matsuyama Y
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2017; 14():6. PubMed ID: 28592984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Proportional Hazards Regression Model for the Sub-distribution with Covariates Adjusted Censoring Weight for Competing Risks Data.
    He P; Eriksson F; Scheike TH; Zhang MJ
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2016 Mar; 43(1):103-122. PubMed ID: 27034534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.