These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36271218)
21. Bayesian Calibration of Computational Knee Models to Estimate Subject-Specific Ligament Properties, Tibiofemoral Kinematics, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Force With Uncertainty Quantification. Razu SS; Jahandar H; Zhu A; Berube EE; Manzi JE; Pearle AD; Nawabi DH; Wickiewicz TL; Santner TJ; Imhauser CW J Biomech Eng; 2023 Jul; 145(7):. PubMed ID: 36826392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Uncertainty quantification of dynamic earthquake rupture simulations. Daub EG; Arabnejad H; Mahmood I; Groen D Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200076. PubMed ID: 33775142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction uncertainty assessment of chromatography models using Bayesian inference. Briskot T; Stückler F; Wittkopp F; Williams C; Yang J; Konrad S; Doninger K; Griesbach J; Bennecke M; Hepbildikler S; Hubbuch J J Chromatogr A; 2019 Feb; 1587():101-110. PubMed ID: 30579636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Addressing and reducing parameter uncertainty in quantitative microbial risk assessment by incorporating external information via Bayesian hierarchical modeling. Seis W; Rouault P; Medema G Water Res; 2020 Oct; 185():116202. PubMed ID: 32738602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microsimulation Model Calibration with Approximate Bayesian Computation in R: A Tutorial. Shewmaker P; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Iskandar R; Lake D; Jutkowitz E Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 35311401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Uncertainty quantification for constitutive model calibration of brain tissue. Brewick PT; Teferra K J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Sep; 85():237-255. PubMed ID: 29935439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sensitivity analysis and inverse uncertainty quantification for the left ventricular passive mechanics. Lazarus A; Dalton D; Husmeier D; Gao H Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2022 Jun; 21(3):953-982. PubMed ID: 35377030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accounting for variation in rainfall intensity and surface slope in wash-off model calibration and prediction within the Bayesian framework. Muthusamy M; Wani O; Schellart A; Tait S Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():561-569. PubMed ID: 30007259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficient Bayesian automatic calibration of a functional-structural wheat model using an adaptive design and a metamodelling approach. Blanc E; Enjalbert J; Flutre T; Barbillon P J Exp Bot; 2023 Nov; 74(21):6722-6734. PubMed ID: 37632355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Bayesian method with nonlinear noise model to calibrate constitutive parameters of soft tissue. Wang P; Yan Z; Du Z; Fu Y; Liu Z; Qu S; Zhuang Z J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106070. PubMed ID: 37567066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Uncertainty quantification in virtual surgery hemodynamics predictions for single ventricle palliation. Schiavazzi DE; Arbia G; Baker C; Hlavacek AM; Hsia TY; Marsden AL; Vignon-Clementel IE; Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Mar; 32(3):e02737. PubMed ID: 26217878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Understanding hormonal crosstalk in Arabidopsis root development via emulation and history matching. Jackson SE; Vernon I; Liu J; Lindsey K Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2020 Jul; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 32649296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility. Volodina V; Challenor P Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2197):20200071. PubMed ID: 33775141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bayesian calibration of a computational model of tissue expansion based on a porcine animal model. Han T; Lee T; Ledwon J; Vaca E; Turin S; Kearney A; Gosain AK; Tepole AB Acta Biomater; 2022 Jan; 137():136-146. PubMed ID: 34634507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiobjective Calibration of Disease Simulation Models Using Gaussian Processes. Sai A; Vivas-Valencia C; Imperiale TF; Kong N Med Decis Making; 2019 Jul; 39(5):540-552. PubMed ID: 31375053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology. Helleckes LM; Osthege M; Wiechert W; von Lieres E; Oldiges M PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1009223. PubMed ID: 35255090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: a high performance computing framework. Angelikopoulos P; Papadimitriou C; Koumoutsakos P J Chem Phys; 2012 Oct; 137(14):144103. PubMed ID: 23061835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bayesian calibration of hyperelastic constitutive models of soft tissue. Madireddy S; Sista B; Vemaganti K J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():108-127. PubMed ID: 26751706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Emulator-based Bayesian calibration of the CISNET colorectal cancer models. Pineda-Antunez C; Seguin C; van Duuren LA; Knudsen AB; Davidi B; de Lima PN; Rutter C; Kuntz KM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Collier N; Ozik J; Alarid-Escudero F medRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36909607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bayesian versus Empirical Calibration of Microsimulation Models: A Comparative Analysis. Chrysanthopoulou SA; Rutter CM; Gatsonis CA Med Decis Making; 2021 Aug; 41(6):714-726. PubMed ID: 33966518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]