These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36271782)

  • 1. The relationship of total progressive motile sperm count with the outcome of IUI? An analysis of 5171 cycles.
    Lin H; Li Y; Ou S; Jiao X; Wang W; Haahr T; Humaidan P; Zhang Q
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2022 Nov; 38(11):954-959. PubMed ID: 36271782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of the total progressive motile sperm count (TPMSC) in different infertility factors in IUI: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lin H; Li Y; Ou S; Jiao X; Wang W; Humaidan P; Zhang Q
    BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e040563. PubMed ID: 33550233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is There Any Effect of Change in Pre-Wash and Post-Wash Semen Parameters on the Success of Intrauterine Insemination?
    Yavuzcan A; Yurtçu E; Keyif B; Osmanlıoğlu Ş
    J Pers Med; 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of post-wash total progressive motile sperm count and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination cycles: a retrospective study.
    Ok EK; Doğan OE; Okyay RE; Gülekli B
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 24592093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prewash and postwash total progressively motile sperm counts have poor predictive value for clinical pregnancy after intrauterine insemination.
    Liu S; Chen Z; Wang H; Yang L; Ma C; Sun L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Jun; 153(3):476-482. PubMed ID: 33119129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrauterine insemination performance characteristics and post-processing total motile sperm count in relation to live birth for couples with unexplained infertility in a randomised, multicentre clinical trial.
    Hansen KR; Peck JD; Coward RM; Wild RA; Trussell JC; Krawetz SA; Diamond MP; Legro RS; Coutifaris C; Alvero R; Robinson RD; Casson P; Christman GM; Santoro N; Zhang H
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1296-1305. PubMed ID: 32432326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive value of postwashed total progressively motile sperm count using CASA estimates in 6871 non-donor intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Tan O; Ha T; Carr BR; Nakonezny P; Doody KM; Doody KJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Sep; 31(9):1147-53. PubMed ID: 25106939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination cycles by stratifying pre-wash total motile count and patient-specific factors: a patient counseling tool.
    Gordon CE; Hammer KC; James K; Lanes A; Vagios S; Starosta A; Hornstein M; Souter I
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Dec; 39(12):2811-2818. PubMed ID: 36342575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prewash total motile count is a poor predictor of live birth in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Mankus EB; Holden AE; Seeker PM; Kampschmidt JC; McLaughlin JE; Schenken RS; Knudtson JF
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Apr; 111(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 30929730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How low is too low? Postwash total motile sperm count effect on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.
    Mathes M; Kastrick E; Sayles H; Gustin S
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Dec; 26(5):1108-1113. PubMed ID: 36357350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.
    Lemmens L; Kos S; Beijer C; Brinkman JW; van der Horst FA; van den Hoven L; Kieslinger DC; van Trooyen-van Vrouwerff NJ; Wolthuis A; Hendriks JC; Wetzels AM;
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jun; 105(6):1462-8. PubMed ID: 26930619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Donor IUI is equally effective for heterosexual couples, single women and lesbians, but autologous IUI does worse.
    Soares SR; Cruz M; Vergara V; Requena A; García-Velasco JA
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2184-2192. PubMed ID: 31711203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Factors influencing the clinical pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination].
    Liu WJ; Li WT; Zhang RL; Gao JJ; Wang L; Li YM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Nov; 21(11):992-6. PubMed ID: 26738325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting success of intrauterine insemination using a clinically based scoring system.
    Zippl AL; Wachter A; Rockenschaub P; Toth B; Seeber B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 306(5):1777-1786. PubMed ID: 36069921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization.
    Van Voorhis BJ; Barnett M; Sparks AE; Syrop CH; Rosenthal G; Dawson J
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):661-8. PubMed ID: 11287015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical success of IUI cycles with donor sperm is not affected by total inseminated volume: a RCT.
    Rodriguez-Purata J; Latre L; Ballester M; González-Llagostera C; Rodríguez I; Gonzalez-Foruria I; Buxaderas R; Martinez F; Barri PN; Coroleu B
    Hum Reprod Open; 2018; 2018(2):hoy002. PubMed ID: 30895244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation is a successful step prior to assisted reproductive technology for couples with unexplained infertility.
    Osmanlıoğlu Ş; Şükür YE; Tokgöz VY; Özmen B; Sönmezer M; Berker B; Aytaç R; Atabekoğlu CS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):472-477. PubMed ID: 34151684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between natural and intrauterine insemination-assisted live births and the degree of sperm autoimmunisation.
    Barbonetti A; Castellini C; D'Andrea S; Minaldi E; Totaro M; Francavilla S; Francavilla F
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1288-1295. PubMed ID: 32358600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of different sperm preparation methods on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a retrospective single-center cohort study.
    Vagios S; Velmahos CS; Cherouveim P; Dimitriadis I; Bormann CL
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Sep; 120(3 Pt 2):617-625. PubMed ID: 37225072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review of the literature.
    Nesbit CB; Blanchette-Porter M; Esfandiari N
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Jul; 39(7):1445-1491. PubMed ID: 35731321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.