These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36271955)

  • 41. Initial Experience With Two Active Transcutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants.
    Schwam ZG; Perez ER; Oh S; Wong K; Fan C; Cosetti MK; Wanna GB
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):1212-1215. PubMed ID: 36075090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Adverse events associated with Bonebridge and Osia bone conduction implant devices.
    Crowder HR; Bestourous DE; Reilly BK
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(4):102968. PubMed ID: 33676070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluating the effectiveness of bone conduction hearing implants in rehabilitation of hearing loss.
    Ray J; Wanees E; Dawoud MM; Abu Elnaga H; Abdelhafez TA
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Sep; 280(9):3987-3996. PubMed ID: 36813860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
    den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant.
    Alzhrani F
    Saudi Med J; 2019 Aug; 40(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 31423516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Gerdes T; Salcher RB; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jul; 37(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 27093021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Minimal invasive pocket technique for magnet bone implant hearing aid without fixation.
    Dolhen P; Lipski S; Touijar R; Van Bogaert J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):715-725. PubMed ID: 31811384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Osseointegrated Auditory Devices: Bonebridge.
    Miller ME
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 30612757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Individual computer-assisted 3D planning for surgical placement of a new bone conduction hearing device.
    Plontke SK; Radetzki F; Seiwerth I; Herzog M; Brandt S; Delank KS; Rahne T
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Aug; 35(7):1251-7. PubMed ID: 24770405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Performance With an Adhesive Bone Conduction Device in Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant Users.
    Dahm V; Traxler S; Liepins R; Auinger AB; Sterrer E; Kaider A; Riss D; Arnoldner C
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Apr; 42(4):510-516. PubMed ID: 33443975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Long-term follow-up and review of the Bone Conduction Implant.
    Reinfeldt S; Eeg-Olofsson M; Fredén Jansson KJ; Persson AC; Håkansson B
    Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 421():108503. PubMed ID: 35490057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Outcome prediction for Bonebridge candidates based on audiological indication criteria.
    Wimmer W; von Werdt M; Mantokoudis G; Anschuetz L; Kompis M; Caversaccio M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Oct; 46(5):681-686. PubMed ID: 30635142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bone Conduction: Benefits and Limitations of Surgical and Nonsurgical Devices.
    Snapp H
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 34774231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Surgical and audiological outcomes with a new transcutaneous bone conduction device with reduced transducer thickness in children.
    Willenborg K; Lenarz T; Busch S
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Oct; 280(10):4381-4389. PubMed ID: 37000276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Surgery for the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Arnold A; Caversaccio MD; Mudry A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():47-55. PubMed ID: 21389704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation.
    Briggs R; Van Hasselt A; Luntz M; Goycoolea M; Wigren S; Weber P; Smeds H; Flynn M; Cowan R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jun; 36(5):834-41. PubMed ID: 25634465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Double Ring in Cochlear Otosclerosis: A Limit to Cochlear Implantation? The Solution Is the Surgical Approach.
    Messineo D; Ralli M; Greco A; Di Stadio A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Jun; 100(3_suppl):235S-237S. PubMed ID: 31842623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Expert opinion on candidacy for bone conduction hearing implants Osia System and Baha Connect System.
    Arndt S; Cantore I; Smeds H; Goldberg-Bockhorn E; Lok W; Marco J; Röösli C; Gawęcki W
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2024 Oct; 78(5):18-23. PubMed ID: 39417260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A bone conduction implant using self-drilling screws : Self-drilling screws as a new fixation method of an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant.
    Koitschev A; Neudert M; Lenarz T
    HNO; 2023 Aug; 71(Suppl 1):61-66. PubMed ID: 37322168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Dun CAJ; Faber HT; de Wolf MJF; Cremers CWRJ; Hol MKS
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():22-31. PubMed ID: 21389701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.