154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36272106)
1. Determinants of transplantation success with cryopreserved ovarian tissue: data from 196 women of the FertiPROTEKT network.
Lotz L; Bender-Liebenthron J; Dittrich R; Häberle L; Beckmann MW; Germeyer A; Korell M; Sänger N; Kruessel JS; von Wolff M;
Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2787-2796. PubMed ID: 36272106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ninety-five orthotopic transplantations in 74 women of ovarian tissue after cytotoxic treatment in a fertility preservation network: tissue activity, pregnancy and delivery rates.
Van der Ven H; Liebenthron J; Beckmann M; Toth B; Korell M; Krüssel J; Frambach T; Kupka M; Hohl MK; Winkler-Crepaz K; Seitz S; Dogan A; Griesinger G; Häberlin F; Henes M; Schwab R; Sütterlin M; von Wolff M; Dittrich R;
Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2031-41. PubMed ID: 27378768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Live birth rate after female fertility preservation for cancer or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the three main techniques; embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
Fraison E; Huberlant S; Labrune E; Cavalieri M; Montagut M; Brugnon F; Courbiere B
Hum Reprod; 2023 Mar; 38(3):489-502. PubMed ID: 36421038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis.
Bosdou JK; Venetis CA; Tarlatzis BC; Grimbizis GF; Kolibianakis EM
Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):491-505. PubMed ID: 30689865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of cancer chemotherapy before ovarian cortex cryopreservation on ovarian tissue transplantation.
Poirot C; Fortin A; Lacorte JM; Akakpo JP; Genestie C; Vernant JP; Brice P; Morice P; Leblanc T; Gabarre J; Delmer A; Badachi Y; Drouineaud V; Gouy S; Chalas C; Egels S; Dhédin N; Touraine P; Dommergues M; Lebègue G; Wolf JP; Capron F; Lefebvre G; Boissel N;
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1083-1094. PubMed ID: 31116405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Overnight ovarian tissue transportation for centralized cryobanking: a feasible option.
Liebenthron J; Montag M; Reinsberg J; Köster M; Isachenko V; van der Ven K; van der Ven H; Krüssel JS; von Wolff M
Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 May; 38(5):740-749. PubMed ID: 30733076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 2: The predicted hyper responder.
Oudshoorn SC; van Tilborg TC; Eijkemans MJC; Oosterhuis GJE; Friederich J; van Hooff MHA; van Santbrink EJP; Brinkhuis EA; Smeenk JMJ; Kwee J; de Koning CH; Groen H; Lambalk CB; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2506-2514. PubMed ID: 29121269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of transplantations of cryopreserved ovarian tissue to 41 women in Denmark.
Jensen AK; Kristensen SG; Macklon KT; Jeppesen JV; Fedder J; Ernst E; Andersen CY
Hum Reprod; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2838-45. PubMed ID: 26443605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of in vitro parameters and fertility of mouse ovary after storage at an optimal temperature and duration for transportation.
Kamoshita K; Okamoto N; Nakajima M; Haino T; Sugimoto K; Okamoto A; Sugishita Y; Suzuki N
Hum Reprod; 2016 Apr; 31(4):774-81. PubMed ID: 26908843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation: lessons learned from 545 cases.
Jadoul P; Guilmain A; Squifflet J; Luyckx M; Votino R; Wyns C; Dolmans MM
Hum Reprod; 2017 May; 32(5):1046-1054. PubMed ID: 28333228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emergency IVF for embryo freezing to preserve female fertility: a French multicentre cohort study.
Courbiere B; Decanter C; Bringer-Deutsch S; Rives N; Mirallié S; Pech JC; De Ziegler D; Carré-Pigeon F; May-Panloup P; Sifer C; Amice V; Schweitzer T; Porcu-Buisson G; Poirot C;
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2381-8. PubMed ID: 23832792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pregnancies and live births after 20 transplantations of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a single center.
Dittrich R; Hackl J; Lotz L; Hoffmann I; Beckmann MW
Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):462-8. PubMed ID: 25487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles.
Law YJ; Zhang N; Venetis CA; Chambers GM; Harris K
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 31398253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience with transplantation of human cryopreserved ovarian tissue to a sub-peritoneal abdominal site.
Gook D; Hale L; Polyakov A; Manley T; Rozen G; Stern K
Hum Reprod; 2021 Aug; 36(9):2473-2483. PubMed ID: 34255039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cumulative live birth rates for women returning to ART treatment for a second ART-conceived child.
Paul RC; Fitzgerald O; Lieberman D; Venetis C; Chambers GM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1432-1440. PubMed ID: 32380547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 1: The predicted poor responder.
van Tilborg TC; Torrance HL; Oudshoorn SC; Eijkemans MJC; Koks CAM; Verhoeve HR; Nap AW; Scheffer GJ; Manger AP; Schoot BC; Sluijmer AV; Verhoeff A; Groen H; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM;
Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2496-2505. PubMed ID: 29121326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nomogram to predict live birth rate after fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumours.
Ouldamer L; Bendifallah S; Naoura I; Body G; Uzan C; Morice P; Ballester M; Daraï E
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1732-7. PubMed ID: 27496944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.
Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance.
Morin SJ; Patounakis G; Juneau CR; Neal SA; Scott RT; Seli E
Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 30010882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
