145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36273127)
1. Impacts of additive, dominance, and inbreeding depression effects on genomic evaluation by combining two SNP chips in Canadian Yorkshire pigs bred in China.
Mei Q; Vitezica ZG; Li J; Zhao S; Legarra A; Xiang T
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Oct; 54(1):69. PubMed ID: 36273127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.
Guo X; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Wang Y; Lund MS; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):67. PubMed ID: 27623617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies for additive and dominance effects for body composition traits using 50 K and imputed high-density SNP genotypes in Yunong-black pigs.
Wu Z; Dou T; Bai L; Han J; Yang F; Wang K; Han X; Qiao R; Li XL; Li XJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2024 Mar; 141(2):124-137. PubMed ID: 37822282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Mohammadpanah M; Ayatollahi Mehrgardi A; Gilbert H; Larzul C; Mercat MJ; Esmailizadeh A; Momen M; Tusell L
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3795. PubMed ID: 35264636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs.
González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Carillier-Jacquin C; Bouquet A; Vitezica ZG
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):55. PubMed ID: 31558151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic studies with preselected markers reveal dominance effects influencing growth traits in Eucalyptus nitens.
Thumma BR; Joyce KR; Jacobs A
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimate of inbreeding depression on growth and reproductive traits in a Large White pig population.
Zhang Y; Zhuo Y; Ning C; Zhou L; Liu JF
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35551391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Haplotype genomic prediction of phenotypic values based on chromosome distance and gene boundaries using low-coverage sequencing in Duroc pigs.
Bian C; Prakapenka D; Tan C; Yang R; Zhu D; Guo X; Liu D; Cai G; Li Y; Liang Z; Wu Z; Da Y; Hu X
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Oct; 53(1):78. PubMed ID: 34620094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic Prediction of Average Daily Gain, Back-Fat Thickness, and Loin Muscle Depth Using Different Genomic Tools in Canadian Swine Populations.
Salek Ardestani S; Jafarikia M; Sargolzaei M; Sullivan B; Miar Y
Front Genet; 2021; 12():665344. PubMed ID: 34149806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine.
Culbertson MS; Mabry JW; Misztal I; Gengler N; Bertrand JK; Varona L
J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 9498351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Additive and Non-Additive Effects on Growth Traits in Duroc Pigs.
Xue Y; Liu S; Li W; Mao R; Zhuo Y; Xing W; Liu J; Wang C; Zhou L; Lei M; Liu J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inbreeding depression across the genome of Dutch Holstein Friesian dairy cattle.
Doekes HP; Bijma P; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Wientjes YCJ; Windig JJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Oct; 52(1):64. PubMed ID: 33115403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.
Srihi H; Noguera JL; Topayan V; Martín de Hijas M; Ibañez-Escriche N; Casellas J; Vázquez-Gómez M; Martínez-Castillero M; Rosas JP; Varona L
Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement of prediction ability for genomic selection of dairy cattle by including dominance effects.
Sun C; VanRaden PM; Cole JB; O'Connell JR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e103934. PubMed ID: 25084281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits.
Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Feb; 94(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 22353246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
