220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36273432)
1. SPiP: Splicing Prediction Pipeline, a machine learning tool for massive detection of exonic and intronic variant effects on mRNA splicing.
Leman R; Parfait B; Vidaud D; Girodon E; Pacot L; Le Gac G; Ka C; Ferec C; Fichou Y; Quesnelle C; Aucouturier C; Muller E; Vaur D; Castera L; Boulouard F; Ricou A; Tubeuf H; Soukarieh O; Gaildrat P; Riant F; Guillaud-Bataille M; Caputo SM; Caux-Moncoutier V; Boutry-Kryza N; Bonnet-Dorion F; Schultz I; Rossing M; Quenez O; Goldenberg L; Harter V; Parsons MT; Spurdle AB; Frébourg T; Martins A; Houdayer C; Krieger S
Hum Mutat; 2022 Dec; 43(12):2308-2323. PubMed ID: 36273432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel diagnostic tool for prediction of variant spliceogenicity derived from a set of 395 combined in silico/in vitro studies: an international collaborative effort.
Leman R; Gaildrat P; Le Gac G; Ka C; Fichou Y; Audrezet MP; Caux-Moncoutier V; Caputo SM; Boutry-Kryza N; Léone M; Mazoyer S; Bonnet-Dorion F; Sevenet N; Guillaud-Bataille M; Rouleau E; Bressac-de Paillerets B; Wappenschmidt B; Rossing M; Muller D; Bourdon V; Revillon F; Parsons MT; Rousselin A; Davy G; Castelain G; Castéra L; Sokolowska J; Coulet F; Delnatte C; Férec C; Spurdle AB; Martins A; Krieger S; Houdayer C
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Sep; 46(15):7913-7923. PubMed ID: 29750258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of 30 putative BRCA1 splicing mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families identifies exonic splice site mutations that escape in silico prediction.
Wappenschmidt B; Becker AA; Hauke J; Weber U; Engert S; Köhler J; Kast K; Arnold N; Rhiem K; Hahnen E; Meindl A; Schmutzler RK
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50800. PubMed ID: 23239986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanism and modeling of human disease-associated near-exon intronic variants that perturb RNA splicing.
Chiang HL; Chen YT; Su JY; Lin HN; Yu CA; Hung YJ; Wang YL; Huang YT; Lin CL
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2022 Nov; 29(11):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36303034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MutPred Splice: machine learning-based prediction of exonic variants that disrupt splicing.
Mort M; Sterne-Weiler T; Li B; Ball EV; Cooper DN; Radivojac P; Sanford JR; Mooney SD
Genome Biol; 2014 Jan; 15(1):R19. PubMed ID: 24451234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpretable prioritization of splice variants in diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
Danis D; Jacobsen JOB; Carmody LC; Gargano MA; McMurry JA; Hegde A; Haendel MA; Valentini G; Smedley D; Robinson PN
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Sep; 108(9):1564-1577. PubMed ID: 34289339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CI-SpliceAI-Improving machine learning predictions of disease causing splicing variants using curated alternative splice sites.
Strauch Y; Lord J; Niranjan M; Baralle D
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269159. PubMed ID: 35657932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays.
Riepe TV; Khan M; Roosing S; Cremers FPM; 't Hoen PAC
Hum Mutat; 2021 Jul; 42(7):799-810. PubMed ID: 33942434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A deep intronic TCTN2 variant activating a cryptic exon predicted by SpliceRover in a patient with Joubert syndrome.
Hiraide T; Shimizu K; Okumura Y; Miyamoto S; Nakashima M; Ogata T; Saitsu H
J Hum Genet; 2023 Jul; 68(7):499-505. PubMed ID: 36894704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combining genetic constraint with predictions of alternative splicing to prioritize deleterious splicing in rare disease studies.
Cormier MJ; Pedersen BS; Bayrak-Toydemir P; Quinlan AR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):482. PubMed ID: 36376793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Introme accurately predicts the impact of coding and noncoding variants on gene splicing, with clinical applications.
Sullivan PJ; Gayevskiy V; Davis RL; Wong M; Mayoh C; Mallawaarachchi A; Hort Y; McCabe MJ; Beecroft S; Jackson MR; Arts P; Dubowsky A; Laing N; Dinger ME; Scott HS; Oates E; Pinese M; Cowley MJ
Genome Biol; 2023 May; 24(1):118. PubMed ID: 37198692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.
Moles-Fernández A; Domènech-Vivó J; Tenés A; Balmaña J; Diez O; Gutiérrez-Enríquez S
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Jul; 13(13):. PubMed ID: 34283047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Splicing analysis of 24 potential spliceogenic variants in MMR genes and clinical interpretation based on refined ACMG/AMP criteria.
Bouras A; Lefol C; Ruano E; Grand-Masson C; Auclair-Perrossier J; Wang Q
Hum Mol Genet; 2024 May; 33(10):850-859. PubMed ID: 38311346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CADD-Splice-improving genome-wide variant effect prediction using deep learning-derived splice scores.
Rentzsch P; Schubach M; Shendure J; Kircher M
Genome Med; 2021 Feb; 13(1):31. PubMed ID: 33618777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Splicing dysregulation contributes to the pathogenicity of several F9 exonic point variants.
Katneni UK; Liss A; Holcomb D; Katagiri NH; Hunt R; Bar H; Ismail A; Komar AA; Kimchi-Sarfaty C
Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2019 Aug; 7(8):e840. PubMed ID: 31257730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays.
Smith C; Kitzman JO
Genome Biol; 2023 Dec; 24(1):294. PubMed ID: 38129864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining full-length gene assay and SpliceAI to interpret the splicing impact of all possible SPINK1 coding variants.
Wu H; Lin JH; Tang XY; Marenne G; Zou WB; Schutz S; Masson E; Génin E; Fichou Y; Le Gac G; Férec C; Liao Z; Chen JM
Hum Genomics; 2024 Feb; 18(1):21. PubMed ID: 38414044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MutSpliceDB: A database of splice sites variants with RNA-seq based evidence on effects on splicing.
Palmisano A; Vural S; Zhao Y; Sonkin D
Hum Mutat; 2021 Apr; 42(4):342-345. PubMed ID: 33600011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deciphering the impact of coding and non-coding SCN1A gene variants on RNA splicing.
Sparber P; Sharova M; Davydenko K; Pyankov D; Filatova A; Skoblov M
Brain; 2024 Apr; 147(4):1278-1293. PubMed ID: 37956038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why Selection Might Be Stronger When Populations Are Small: Intron Size and Density Predict within and between-Species Usage of Exonic Splice Associated cis-Motifs.
Wu X; Hurst LD
Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Jul; 32(7):1847-61. PubMed ID: 25771198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
