145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36273442)
1. Laparoscopic Single-Port versus Mini-Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: An International Study.
Delgado-Sánchez E; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Couso A; Zapico Á; Bogliolo S; Sánchez-Torres DA; Gardella B; Thuissard-Vasallo IJ; Zapardiel I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2022; 87(6):381-388. PubMed ID: 36273442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery.
Rossitto C; Cianci S; Gueli Alletti S; Perrone E; Pizzacalla S; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():125-129. PubMed ID: 28753500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minilaparoscopic versus single-port total hysterectomy: a randomized trial.
Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Gagliardi ML; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Gueli Alletti S; Vizzielli G; Ercoli A; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 23332717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a percutaneous surgical system: a pilot study towards scarless surgery.
Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Rotolo S; Cianci S; Panico G; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():132-5. PubMed ID: 27289066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Percutaneous-assisted vs mini-laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of ultra-minimally invasive approaches.
Cianci S; Perrone E; Rossitto C; Fanfani F; Tropea A; Biondi A; Scambia G; Gueli Alletti S
Updates Surg; 2021 Dec; 73(6):2347-2354. PubMed ID: 32996053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.
Baracy MG; Martinez M; Hagglund K; Afzal F; Kulkarni S; Corey L; Aslam MF
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 34981444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique in gynecology: a single surgeon's experience.
Yang YS; Oh KY; Hur MH; Kim SY; Yim HS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 25051536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advanced Training of Gynecologic Surgeons and Incidence of Intraoperative Complications after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study of More Than 2000 Cases at a Single Institution.
McDonnell RM; Hollingworth JL; Chivers P; Cohen PA; Salfinger SG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):810-815. PubMed ID: 29253636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Morcellation Techniques at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.
Meurs EAIM; Brito LG; Ajao MO; Goggins ER; Vitonis AF; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):843-849. PubMed ID: 28483536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus single-port laparoscopy: Comparison of early outcomes.
Basol G; Cora AO; Gundogdu EC; Mat E; Yildiz G; Kuru B; Uzun ND; Uzel K; Usta T; Kale A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Sep; 47(9):3288-3296. PubMed ID: 34196084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysterectomy for Non-Prolapsed Uterus in Elderly Patients: Predictors of Prolonged Hospital Stay.
Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Pinelli C; Laganà AS; Ambrosoli A; Longo M; Cromi A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):91-97. PubMed ID: 36450224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparison.
Perrone E; Rossitto C; Fanfani F; Cianci S; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Vizzielli G; Vascone C; Restaino S; Fedele C; Saleh FL; Scambia G; Gueli Alletti S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(4):318-326. PubMed ID: 32920558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.
Kim SM; Park EK; Jeung IC; Kim CJ; Lee YS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 25488157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
