These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36273874)

  • 1. [Measurement of Absorbed Dose in the Air in X-ray CT Examination Rooms Using a Special Protective Shield for CT].
    Komiya R; Ishitsuka R; Ota J; Higashida R; Kawasaki T; Masuda Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Nov; 78(11):1341-1348. PubMed ID: 36273874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Development of the Radiation Protective Curtain for the Dose Reduction of Caregivers during Computed Tomography Examinations].
    Moroi S; Nakashima J; Miyasaka K; Hoshina T; Kato K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022; 78(2):140-151. PubMed ID: 35185093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
    Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usefulness of a lead-acrylic shield for reducing lens dose of assistant in x-ray CT examination.
    Ito H; Matsubara K; Kobayashi I; Sakai T; Isobe T; Yanagawa N; Ochi S
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Jun; 42(2):. PubMed ID: 35705067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of an X-Ray Dose Profile Derived from an Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter during Computed Tomographic Fluoroscopy.
    Hasegawa H; Sato M; Tanaka H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132154. PubMed ID: 26151914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization and implementation of OSL dosimeters for use in evaluating the efficacy of organ-based tube current modulation for CT scans of the face and orbits.
    Marsh RM; Silosky M
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1730-8. PubMed ID: 25832062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-plane shielding for CT: effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance.
    Kalra MK; Dang P; Singh S; Saini S; Shepard JA
    Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 19270862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose reduction to the eye lens in head CT using tungsten functional paper and organ-based tube current modulation.
    Kosaka H; Monzen H; Amano M; Tamura M; Hattori S; Kono Y; Nishimura Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 124():108814. PubMed ID: 31945674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose reduction in cone-beam computed tomography of extremities: evaluation of a novel radiation shield.
    Matikka H; Virén T
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):N57-63. PubMed ID: 24894593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scattered radiation doses absorbed by technicians at different distances from X-ray exposure: Experiments on prosthesis.
    Chiang HW; Liu YL; Chen TR; Chen CL; Chiang HJ; Chao SY
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1641-50. PubMed ID: 26405929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An artifact-free thyroid shield in CT examination: a phantom study.
    Sutanto H; Irdawati Y; Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Dougherty G; Hidayanto E; Arifin Z; Soedarsono JW; Bahrudin
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015029. PubMed ID: 33438617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of absorbed doses in organs of medical staff at (18)F-FDG pet examination.
    Fujibuchi T; Iimori T; Isobe T; Masuda Y; Uchida Y; Matsubayashi F; Sakae T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2010 Jan; 3(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 20821099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models.
    Salvadó M; López M; Morant JJ; Calzado A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15933138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EYE RADIATION DOSE SAVING IN HEAD CT EXAMINATIONS USING COPPER-BISMUTH RADIATION SHIELD.
    Keshtkar M; Blouri B; Mahmoudabadi A; Alami A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Feb; 199(2):146-151. PubMed ID: 36484690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Radiation Protection Methods for Assistant Staff during CT Imaging in High-energy Trauma: Lens Dosimetry with a Phantom Study.
    Ota J; Yokota H; Kawasaki T; Taoka J; Kato H; Chida K; Masuda Y; Uno T
    Health Phys; 2021 Jun; 120(6):635-640. PubMed ID: 33879645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lens dose reduction with a bismuth shield in neuro cone-beam computed tomography: an investigation on optimum shield device placement conditions.
    Kawauchi S; Chida K; Hamada Y; Tsuruta W
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Mar; 15(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 34796447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of a free-standing lead-shield in reducing spine surgeon radiation exposure during intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging.
    Guenthner G; Eddy A; Sembrano J; Polly DW; Martin CT
    Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1685-1691. PubMed ID: 32445800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effective dose in X-ray examinations: comparison between spiral CT and urography in the study of renal colic].
    De Denaro M; Bregant P; Cupardo F; De Guarrini F; Rimondini A; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 11740454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effective Techniques to Reduce Radiation Exposure to Medical Staff during Assist of X-ray Computed Tomography Examination].
    Miyajima R; Fujibuchi T; Miyachi Y; Tateishi S; Uno Y; Amakawa K; Ohura H; Orita S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(4):326-334. PubMed ID: 29681599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
    Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.