288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36274301)
1. Climate change mitigation potentials of biofuels produced from perennial crops and natural regrowth on abandoned and degraded cropland in Nordic countries.
Næss JS; Hu X; Gvein MH; Iordan CM; Cavalett O; Dorber M; Giroux B; Cherubini F
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116474. PubMed ID: 36274301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Climate vs Energy Security: Quantifying the Trade-offs of BECCS Deployment and Overcoming Opportunity Costs on Set-Aside Land.
Blanc-Betes E; Gomez-Casanovas N; Hartman MD; Hudiburg TW; Khanna M; Parton WJ; DeLucia EH
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Dec; 57(48):19732-19748. PubMed ID: 37934080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land-based climate-change mitigation efforts.
Krause A; Pugh TAM; Bayer AD; Li W; Leung F; Bondeau A; Doelman JC; Humpenöder F; Anthoni P; Bodirsky BL; Ciais P; Müller C; Murray-Tortarolo G; Olin S; Popp A; Sitch S; Stehfest E; Arneth A
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Jul; 24(7):3025-3038. PubMed ID: 29569788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carbon sequestration in European croplands.
Smith P; Falloon P
SEB Exp Biol Ser; 2005; ():47-55. PubMed ID: 17633030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Landscape patterns of bioenergy in a changing climate: implications for crop allocation and land-use competition.
Graves RA; Pearson SM; Turner MG
Ecol Appl; 2016 Mar; 26(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 27209792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels.
Field JL; Richard TL; Smithwick EAH; Cai H; Laser MS; LeBauer DS; Long SP; Paustian K; Qin Z; Sheehan JJ; Smith P; Wang MQ; Lynd LR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(36):21968-21977. PubMed ID: 32839342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Global implications of crop-based bioenergy with carbon capture and storage for terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity.
Hanssen SV; Steinmann ZJN; Daioglou V; Čengić M; Van Vuuren DP; Huijbregts MAJ
Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2022 Mar; 14(3):307-321. PubMed ID: 35875590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States.
Baik E; Sanchez DL; Turner PA; Mach KJ; Field CB; Benson SM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(13):3290-3295. PubMed ID: 29531081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use.
Whitaker J; Field JL; Bernacchi CJ; Cerri CEP; Ceulemans R; Davies CA; DeLucia EH; Donnison IS; McCalmont JP; Paustian K; Rowe RL; Smith P; Thornley P; McNamara NP
Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2018 Mar; 10(3):150-164. PubMed ID: 29497458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The neglected role of abandoned cropland in supporting both food security and climate change mitigation.
Zheng Q; Ha T; Prishchepov AV; Zeng Y; Yin H; Koh LP
Nat Commun; 2023 Sep; 14(1):6083. PubMed ID: 37770491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can biomass supply meet the demands of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)?
Jones MB; Albanito F
Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Oct; 26(10):5358-5364. PubMed ID: 32726492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing Marginal Land Availability Based on Land Use Change Information in the Contiguous United States.
Jiang C; Guan K; Khanna M; Chen L; Peng J
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Aug; 55(15):10794-10804. PubMed ID: 34297551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Historical U.S. cropland areas and the potential for bioenergy production on abandoned croplands.
Zumkehr A; Campbell JE
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(8):3840-7. PubMed ID: 23506118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioenergy crop production and carbon sequestration potential under changing climate and land use: A case study in the upper River Taw catchment in southwest England.
Dixit PN; Richter GM; Coleman K; Collins AL
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Nov; 900():166390. PubMed ID: 37597557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioenergy cropland expansion may offset positive effects of climate change mitigation for global vertebrate diversity.
Hof C; Voskamp A; Biber MF; Böhning-Gaese K; Engelhardt EK; Niamir A; Willis SG; Hickler T
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Dec; 115(52):13294-13299. PubMed ID: 30530689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can bioenergy carbon capture and storage aggravate global water crisis?
Hu B; Zhang Y; Li Y; Teng Y; Yue W
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 714():136856. PubMed ID: 32018988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Climate mitigation and the future of tropical landscapes.
Thomson AM; Calvin KV; Chini LP; Hurtt G; Edmonds JA; Bond-Lamberty B; Frolking S; Wise MA; Janetos AC
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Nov; 107(46):19633-8. PubMed ID: 20921413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioenergy Crops for Low Warming Targets Require Half of the Present Agricultural Fertilizer Use.
Li W; Ciais P; Han M; Zhao Q; Chang J; Goll DS; Zhu L; Wang J
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Aug; 55(15):10654-10661. PubMed ID: 34288664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice?
Kalt G; Mayer A; Theurl MC; Lauk C; Erb KH; Haberl H
Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2019 Nov; 11(11):1283-1297. PubMed ID: 31762785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential of global croplands and bioenergy crops for climate change mitigation through deployment for enhanced weathering.
Kantola IB; Masters MD; Beerling DJ; Long SP; DeLucia EH
Biol Lett; 2017 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28381630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
