These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36274436)

  • 1. Estimating production costs and retail prices in different poultry housing systems: conventional, enriched cage, aviary, and barn in Japan.
    Kato H; Shimizuike Y; Yasuda K; Yoshimatsu R; Yasuda KT; Imamura Y; Imai R
    Poult Sci; 2022 Dec; 101(12):102194. PubMed ID: 36274436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic and market issues on the sustainability of egg production in the United States: analysis of alternative production systems.
    Sumner DA; Gow H; Hayes D; Matthews W; Norwood B; Rosen-Molina JT; Thurman W
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 21177466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality.
    Ahammed M; Chae BJ; Lohakare J; Keohavong B; Lee MH; Lee SJ; Kim DM; Lee JY; Ohh SJ
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1196-203. PubMed ID: 25083115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production.
    Matthews WA; Sumner DA
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):552-7. PubMed ID: 25480736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a commercial housing system on egg quality during extended storage.
    Jones DR; Karcher DM; Abdo Z
    Poult Sci; 2014 May; 93(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 24795324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hen genetic strain and extended cold storage influence on physical egg quality from cage-free aviary housing system.
    Jones DR; Karcher DM; Regmi P; Robison CO; Gast RK
    Poult Sci; 2018 Jul; 97(7):2347-2355. PubMed ID: 29617856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The utilization of the Welfare Quality® assessment for determining laying hen condition across three housing systems.
    Blatchford RA; Fulton RM; Mench JA
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jan; 95(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 26240396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of three egg production systems: Housing characteristics and management practices.
    Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Swanson JC; Mench JA; Karcher DM; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 25737566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions.
    Shepherd TA; Zhao Y; Li H; Stinn JP; Hayes MD; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 25737568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nutrient flow and distribution in conventional cage, enriched colony, and aviary layer houses.
    Lin XJ; Zhang R; Jiang S; Elmashad HM; Mitloehner F
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jan; 95(1):213-24. PubMed ID: 26628346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sustainability of egg production in the United States--the policy and market context.
    Mench JA; Sumner DA; Rosen-Molina JT
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):229-40. PubMed ID: 21177465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Animal welfare with Chinese characteristics: Chinese poultry producers' perceptions of, and attitudes towards, animal welfare.
    Yang Q; Dwyer CM; Vigors B; Zhao R; Langford FM
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0307061. PubMed ID: 39024229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health of Commercial Egg Laying Chickens in Different Housing Systems.
    Fulton RM
    Avian Dis; 2019 Sep; 63(3):420-426. PubMed ID: 31967424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review: What are the challenges facing the table egg industry in the next decades and what can be done to address them?
    Gautron J; Réhault-Godbert S; Van de Braak TGH; Dunn IC
    Animal; 2021 Dec; 15 Suppl 1():100282. PubMed ID: 34246597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems.
    Jones DR; Cox NA; Guard J; Fedorka-Cray PJ; Buhr RJ; Gast RK; Abdo Z; Rigsby LL; Plumblee JR; Karcher DM; Robison CI; Blatchford RA; Makagon MM
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):544-51. PubMed ID: 25480737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulations of Future Trends in Welfare-Centric Egg Production Systems: Impacts on Productivity and Prices.
    Kato H; Shimasaki T; Yayou KI
    J Poult Sci; 2024; 61():2024019. PubMed ID: 38867851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An economic analysis of performance data from toe-clipped laying hens housed at variable stocking densities.
    Satterlee DG; Goodling AC; Huffman DC
    Poult Sci; 1985 Aug; 64(8):1424-9. PubMed ID: 4048046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems - Part III: Airborne bacteria concentrations and emissions.
    Zhao Y; Zhao D; Ma H; Liu K; Atilgan A; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jul; 95(7):1473-1481. PubMed ID: 26994201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contamination of eggs by Salmonella Enteritidis in experimentally infected laying hens housed in conventional or enriched cages.
    Gast RK; Guraya R; Jones DR; Anderson KE
    Poult Sci; 2014 Mar; 93(3):728-33. PubMed ID: 24604868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range).
    Yilmaz Dikmen B; İpek A; Şahan Ü; Petek M; Sözcü A
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jul; 95(7):1564-1572. PubMed ID: 26994200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.