These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36275352)

  • 1. A Comprehensive Review of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.
    Atti V; Narayanan MA; Patel B; Balla S; Siddique A; Lundgren S; Velagapudi P
    Heart Int; 2022; 16(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 36275352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Escalation strategies, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock patients receiving percutaneous left ventricular support.
    Patlolla SH; Gilbert ON; Belford PM; Morris BN; Jentzer JC; Pisani BA; Applegate RJ; Zhao DX; Vallabhajosyula S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Sep; 102(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 37473420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.
    Pahuja M; Yerasi C; Lam PH; Hashim H; Ben-Dor I; Bernardo NL; Satler LF; Sheikh FH; Najjar SS; Molina EJ; Waksman R
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Apr; 25(4):213-227. PubMed ID: 36847990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Important role of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Truby L; Naka Y; Kalesan B; Ota T; Kirtane AJ; Kodali S; Nikic N; Mundy L; Colombo P; Jorde UP; Takayama H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Aug; 48(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 25480935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock.
    Ni hIci T; Boardman HM; Baig K; Stafford JL; Cernei C; Bodger O; Westaby S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jun; 6(6):CD013002. PubMed ID: 32496607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy.
    Pahuja M; Hernandez-Montfort J; Whitehead EH; Kawabori M; Kapur NK
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34894975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra-aortic balloon pump versus percutaneous Impella
    Frain K; Rees P
    Perfusion; 2024 Jan; 39(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 34479465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in refractory cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    den Uil CA; Akin S; Jewbali LS; Dos Reis Miranda D; Brugts JJ; Constantinescu AA; Kappetein AP; Caliskan K
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Jul; 52(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 28472406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.
    Alkhouli M; Osman M; Elsisy MFA; Kawsara A; Berzingi CO
    Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med; 2020 Jan; 22(2):4. PubMed ID: 31997019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Shi Y; Wang Y; Sun X; Tang Y; Jiang M; Bai Y; Liu S; Jiang W; Yuan H; Lu Y; Cai J
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jun; 11(6):e044072. PubMed ID: 34187815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancements in mechanical circulatory support for patients in acute and chronic heart failure.
    Csepe TA; Kilic A
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Oct; 9(10):4070-4083. PubMed ID: 29268418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Kondo T; Araki T; Imaizumi T; Sumita Y; Nakai M; Tanaka A; Okumura T; Butt JH; Petrie MC; McMurray JJV; Murohara T
    JACC Asia; 2023 Feb; 3(1):122-134. PubMed ID: 36873766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hospital market concentration and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Vohra AS; Jang SJ; Feldman DN; Goyal P; Krishnan U; Sciria C; Cheung JW; Kim LK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Jan; 22(1):89. PubMed ID: 35045849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of Renal Function in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With or Without Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Upadhyaya VD; Alshami A; Patel I; Douedi S; Quinlan A; Thomas T; Prentice J; Calderon D; Asif A; Sen S; Mehra A; Hossain MA
    J Clin Med Res; 2021 May; 13(5):283-292. PubMed ID: 34104280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.
    Alasnag M; Truesdell AG; Williams H; Martinez SC; Qadri SK; Skendelas JP; Jakobleff WA; Alasnag M
    Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2020 Apr; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 32328843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Thiele H; Jobs A; Ouweneel DM; Henriques JPS; Seyfarth M; Desch S; Eitel I; Pöss J; Fuernau G; de Waha S
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Dec; 38(47):3523-3531. PubMed ID: 29020341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.