These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36276238)
1. The Use of TADs in the Mandibular Arch to Prevent Proclination of the Lower Incisors during the Use of the Mini Scope Herbst Appliance. Aiello D; Finamore A; Scribante A; Figliuzzi MM; Paduano S Case Rep Dent; 2022; 2022():9144900. PubMed ID: 36276238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is significant mandibular advancement possible after the peak of puberty? Dento-osseous palatal expansion and the STM4 technique (Skeletal Therapy Manni Telescopic Herbst 4 miniscrews): A case report. Manni A; Boggio A; Gastaldi G; Cozzani M Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100868. PubMed ID: 38471383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal and dental effects of Herbst appliance anchored with temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Al-Dboush R; Soltan R; Rao J; El-Bialy T Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 34145968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Dentaoalveolar changes in young adult patients with class II/1 malocclusion treated with the herbst appliance and an activator]. Nedeljković N; Sćepan I; Glisić B; Marković E Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Feb; 67(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 20337101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Obijou C; Pancherz H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 9294358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances. Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation. VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes. Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Co-Go-Me angle as a predictor in Class II patients treated with Herbst appliance and skeletal anchorage: a retrospective cohort study. Manni A; Migliorati M; Boggio A; Drago S; Paggi E; Calzolari C; Gastaldi G; Cozzani M Front Oral Health; 2024; 5():1389628. PubMed ID: 38745852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-implants and the efficiency of Herbst treatment: a preliminary study. Luzi C; Luzi V; Melsen B Prog Orthod; 2013 Jul; 14():21. PubMed ID: 24325903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects. Kinzinger G; Frye L; Diedrich P J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):63-91. PubMed ID: 19194676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances. Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Herbst appliance anchored to miniscrews with 2 types of ligation: Effectiveness in skeletal Class II treatment. Manni A; Mutinelli S; Pasini M; Mazzotta L; Cozzani M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jun; 149(6):871-80. PubMed ID: 27241998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Skeletal Class II treatment with the miniscrew-anchored Herbst]. Luzi C; Luzi V Orthod Fr; 2013 Dec; 84(4):307-18. PubMed ID: 24280546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Pancherz H Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of fixed functional appliances with temporary anchorage devices on Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Huang Y; Sun W; Xiong X; Zhang Z; Liu J; Wang J J World Fed Orthod; 2021 Jun; 10(2):59-69. PubMed ID: 33785320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances: a retrospective study. Zelderloo A; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Fieuws S; Willems G Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):334-341. PubMed ID: 27742730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions. Alves PF; Oliveira AG World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]