239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36276721)
1. The impact of medication on osseointegration and implant anchorage in bone determined using removal torque-A review.
Jolic M; Sharma S; Palmquist A; Shah FA
Heliyon; 2022 Oct; 8(10):e10844. PubMed ID: 36276721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laser-Modified Surface Enhances Osseointegration and Biomechanical Anchorage of Commercially Pure Titanium Implants for Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.
Shah FA; Johansson ML; Omar O; Simonsson H; Palmquist A; Thomsen P
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157504. PubMed ID: 27299883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of different surface modifications for titanium implants installed into the goat iliac crest.
van Oirschot BA; Meijer GJ; Bronkhorst EM; Närhi T; Jansen JA; van den Beucken JJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):e57-67. PubMed ID: 25486997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of controlled nanotopography, machined topography and their combination on molecular activities, bone formation and biomechanical stability during osseointegration.
Karazisis D; Rasmusson L; Petronis S; Palmquist A; Shah FA; Agheli H; Emanuelsson L; Johansson A; Omar O; Thomsen P
Acta Biomater; 2021 Dec; 136():279-290. PubMed ID: 34626821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ex vivo and in vivo biomechanical test of implant attachment to various materials: introduction of a new user-friendly removal torque equipment.
Johansson CB; Jimbo R; Stefenson P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 20662862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systemic sclerostin antibody treatment increases osseointegration and biomechanical competence of zoledronic-acid-coated dental implants in a rat osteoporosis model.
Korn P; Kramer I; Schlottig F; Tödtman N; Eckelt U; Bürki A; Ferguson SJ; Kautz A; Schnabelrauch M; Range U; Kneissel M; Stadlinger B
Eur Cell Mater; 2019 May; 37():333-346. PubMed ID: 31112281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Restoration of peri-implant defects in immediate implant installations by Choukroun platelet-rich fibrin and silk fibroin powder combination graft.
Jang ES; Park JW; Kweon H; Lee KG; Kang SW; Baek DH; Choi JY; Kim SG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 20163973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enamel matrix derivative and titanium implants.
Franke Stenport V; Johansson CB
J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Apr; 30(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 12694436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative Administration of Alpha-tocopherol Enhances Osseointegration of Stainless Steel Implants: An In Vivo Rat Model.
Savvidis M; Papavasiliou K; Taitzoglou I; Giannakopoulou A; Kitridis D; Galanis N; Vrabas I; Tsiridis E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):406-419. PubMed ID: 31714415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
Lee JT; Cho SA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of implant design on the kinetics of osseointegration and bone anchorage homeostasis.
Liddell RS; Ajami E; Li Y; Bajenova E; Yang Y; Davies JE
Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():514-526. PubMed ID: 33271359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.
Chacon GE; Stine EA; Larsen PE; Beck FM; McGlumphy EA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Habitual caffeine intake affects implant osseointegration: An in vivo study.
Omar O; Abuohashish HM; Alkhamis T; Al-Qarni F
J Periodontal Res; 2021 Dec; 56(6):1070-1078. PubMed ID: 34363706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stimulation of directed bone growth at oxidized titanium implants by macroscopic grooves: an in vivo study.
Hall J; Miranda-Burgos P; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S76-82. PubMed ID: 16137091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
Gottlow J; Barkarmo S; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e204-12. PubMed ID: 22487460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of insertion torque on titanium implant osseointegration: an animal experimental study.
Duyck J; Roesems R; Cardoso MV; Ogawa T; De Villa Camargos G; Vandamme K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 24325598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of a Hydrophilic Dental Implant Surface on Osseointegration: Biomechanical Results in Rabbit.
Jinno Y; Stocchero M; Galli S; Toia M; Becktor JP
J Oral Implantol; 2021 Apr; 47(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 32663272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different drilling preparation on cortical bone: A biomechanical, histological, and micro-CT study on sheep.
Stocchero M; Toia M; Jinno Y; Cecchinato F; Becktor JP; Naito Y; Halldin A; Jimbo R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):707-715. PubMed ID: 29781224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants.
Stenport VF; Johansson CB
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 10(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18241219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
