These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36278608)

  • 1. I Choose to Opt-Out of Answering: Individual Differences in Giving Up Behaviour on Cognitive Tests.
    Law MKH; Stankov L; Kleitman S
    J Intell; 2022 Oct; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 36278608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metacognition in functional cognitive disorder.
    Bhome R; McWilliams A; Price G; Poole NA; Howard RJ; Fleming SM; Huntley JD
    Brain Commun; 2022; 4(2):fcac041. PubMed ID: 35243345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the French version of the « Meta-Cognition Questionnaire » for adolescents (MCQ-Af): Evolution of metacognitive beliefs with age and their links with anxiety during adolescence.
    Lachat Shakeshaft Y; Lecerf T; Morosan L; Badoud DM; Debbané M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230171. PubMed ID: 32160251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are children's judgments of another's accuracy linked to their metacognitive confidence judgments?
    Baer C; Malik P; Odic D
    Metacogn Learn; 2021; 16(2):485-516. PubMed ID: 34720771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and of feeling confident: a large-scale fMRI study.
    Molenberghs P; Trautwein FM; Böckler A; Singer T; Kanske P
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 11(12):1942-1951. PubMed ID: 27445213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limited Cognitive Resources Explain a Trade-Off between Perceptual and Metacognitive Vigilance.
    Maniscalco B; McCurdy LY; Odegaard B; Lau H
    J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(5):1213-1224. PubMed ID: 28028197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Math anxiety relates positively to metacognitive insight into mathematical decision making.
    Desender K; Sasanguie D
    Psychol Res; 2022 Apr; 86(3):1001-1013. PubMed ID: 34008046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thinking Styles and Regret in Physicians.
    Djulbegovic M; Beckstead J; Elqayam S; Reljic T; Kumar A; Paidas C; Djulbegovic B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134038. PubMed ID: 26241650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognitive knowledge and experience across multiple cognitive domains in euthymic bipolar disorder.
    Torres IJ; Hidiroglu C; Mackala SA; Ahn S; Yatham LN; Ozerdem E; Michalak EE
    Eur Psychiatry; 2021 Jun; 64(1):e36. PubMed ID: 34082855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metacognitive accuracy across cognitive and physical task domains.
    Hildenbrand L; Sanchez CA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1524-1530. PubMed ID: 35199328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive Abilities, Monitoring Confidence, and Control Thresholds Explain Individual Differences in Heuristics and Biases.
    Jackson SA; Kleitman S; Howie P; Stankov L
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1559. PubMed ID: 27790170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thinking styles and decision making: A meta-analysis.
    Phillips WJ; Fletcher JM; Marks AD; Hine DW
    Psychol Bull; 2016 Mar; 142(3):260-90. PubMed ID: 26436538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absence without leave or leave without absence: Examining the interrelations among mind wandering, metacognition and cognitive control.
    Drescher LH; Van den Bussche E; Desender K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191639. PubMed ID: 29425205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reverse engineering of metacognition.
    Guggenmos M
    Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36107147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who gives a criterion shift? A uniquely individualistic cognitive trait.
    Layher E; Dixit A; Miller MB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2075-2105. PubMed ID: 33104383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making.
    Wokke ME; Cleeremans A; Ridderinkhof KR
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 28123015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasoning strategy vs cognitive capacity as predictors of individual differences in reasoning performance.
    Thompson VA; Markovits H
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104866. PubMed ID: 34450394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2001; 28():41-100. PubMed ID: 11605365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.