These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36279185)

  • 41. Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted growth prediction in skeletal Class I preadolescent patients using serial lateral cephalograms for a 2-year growth interval.
    Larkin A; Kim JS; Kim N; Baek SH; Yamada S; Park K; Tai K; Yanagi Y; Park JH
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Aug; 27(4):535-543. PubMed ID: 38321788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical applicability of automated cephalometric landmark identification: Part II - Number of images needed to re-learn various quality of images.
    Tanikawa C; Oka A; Lim J; Lee C; Yamashiro T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():53-58. PubMed ID: 34145974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cephalometric landmark detection without X-rays combining coordinate regression and heatmap regression.
    Takahashi K; Shimamura Y; Tachiki C; Nishii Y; Hagiwara M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20011. PubMed ID: 37974018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical applicability of automated cephalometric landmark identification: Part I-Patient-related identification errors.
    Tanikawa C; Lee C; Lim J; Oka A; Yamashiro T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():43-52. PubMed ID: 34021976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Artificial intelligence-based cephalometric landmark annotation and measurements according to Arnett's analysis: can we trust a bot to do that?
    Silva TP; Hughes MM; Menezes LDS; de Melo MFB; Freitas PHL; Takeshita WM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20200548. PubMed ID: 33882247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cephalometric Analysis in Orthodontics Using Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review.
    Subramanian AK; Chen Y; Almalki A; Sivamurthy G; Kafle D
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1880113. PubMed ID: 35757486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F
    J Biomed Biotechnol; 2009; 2009():717102. PubMed ID: 19753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Automated diagnostic classification with lateral cephalograms based on deep learning network model].
    Chang S; Wang SF; Zuo FF; Wang F; Gong BW; Wang YJ; Xie XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 58(6):547-553. PubMed ID: 37271999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software.
    Çoban G; Öztürk T; Hashimli N; Yağci A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e222112. PubMed ID: 35976288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Deep learning for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on lateral cephalometric radiographs using the Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network: a pilot study.
    Jiao Z; Liang Z; Liao Q; Chen S; Yang H; Hong G; Gui H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 May; 137(5):554-562. PubMed ID: 38480069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of automated cephalometric analysis based on the latest deep learning method.
    Hwang HW; Moon JH; Kim MG; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2021 May; 91(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 33434275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks by a designed software.
    Shahidi Sh; Oshagh M; Gozin F; Salehi P; Danaei SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):20110187. PubMed ID: 23236215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of deep learning and convolutional neural network algorithms accuracy for detecting and predicting anatomical landmarks on 2D lateral cephalometric images: A systematic review and
    Londono J; Ghasemi S; Hussain Shah A; Fahimipour A; Ghadimi N; Hashemi S; Khurshid Z; Dashti M
    Saudi Dent J; 2023 Jul; 35(5):487-497. PubMed ID: 37520606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cephalogram synthesis and landmark detection in dental cone-beam CT systems.
    Huang Y; Fan F; Syben C; Roser P; Mill L; Maier A
    Med Image Anal; 2021 May; 70():102028. PubMed ID: 33744833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software.
    Kim HJ; Kim KD; Kim DH
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11659. PubMed ID: 35804075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    de Queiroz Tavares Borges Mesquita G; Vieira WA; Vidigal MTC; Travençolo BAN; Beaini TL; Spin-Neto R; Paranhos LR; de Brito Júnior RB
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Jun; 36(3):1158-1179. PubMed ID: 36604364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Automatic identification of posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using a novel deep learning algorithm: a comparative study with human experts.
    Lee H; Cho JM; Ryu S; Ryu S; Chang E; Jung YS; Kim JY
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):15506. PubMed ID: 37726392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development of novel artificial intelligence systems to predict facial morphology after orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment in Japanese patients.
    Tanikawa C; Yamashiro T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):15853. PubMed ID: 34349151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Web-based fully automated cephalometric analysis by deep learning.
    Kim H; Shim E; Park J; Kim YJ; Lee U; Kim Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105513. PubMed ID: 32403052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software.
    Menezes LDS; Silva TP; Lima Dos Santos MA; Hughes MM; Mariano Souza SDR; Leite Ribeiro PM; Freitas PHL; Takeshita WM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230065. PubMed ID: 37869886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.