These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3627925)

  • 1. Absence of a hemispheric superiority in the recognition of European and Asian faces.
    Singer MS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Jun; 64(3 Pt 2):1237-8. PubMed ID: 3627925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric asymmetry in face perception tasks of different cognitive requirement.
    Marzi CA; Tassinari G; Tressoldi PE; Barry C; Grabowska A
    Hum Neurobiol; 1985; 4(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 3997584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of naming laterally presented known faces by children and adults.
    Young AW; Bion PJ
    Cortex; 1981 Apr; 17(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 7273806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
    Yovel G; Tambini A; Brandman T
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3061-8. PubMed ID: 18639566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric asymmetry: a signal detection analysis.
    Shefsky MW; Stenson HH; Miller LK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Oct; 51(2):599-604. PubMed ID: 7443380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric superiority for recognizing faces depends upon how they are learned.
    Galper RE; Costa L
    Cortex; 1980 Mar; 16(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 7379564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Absence of any developmental trend in right hemisphere superiority for face recognition.
    Young AW; Bion PJ
    Cortex; 1980 Aug; 16(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 7471762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of differential recognition for own- and other-race faces.
    Chance JE; Turner AL; Goldstein AG
    J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 112(1st Half):29-37. PubMed ID: 7143272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing.
    Sergent J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Dec; 11(6):846-61. PubMed ID: 2934512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemispheric preference of paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenics.
    Magaro PA; Chamrad DL
    Biol Psychiatry; 1983 Nov; 18(11):1269-85. PubMed ID: 6652163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential hemispheric processing of faces: methodological considerations and reinterpretation.
    Sergent J; Bindra D
    Psychol Bull; 1981 May; 89(3):541-54. PubMed ID: 7255628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between changes in hemispheric advantage during familiarization to faces and proficiency in facial recognition.
    Ross-Kossak P; Turkewitz G
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 6483173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Brain lesions and perception of blurred faces: hemispheric differences].
    Bruyer R
    Annee Psychol; 1980; 80(2):379-90. PubMed ID: 7235642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A developmental study of hemisphere specialization for recognition of faces in normal subjects.
    Reynolds DM; Jeeves MA
    Cortex; 1978 Dec; 14(4):511-20. PubMed ID: 738061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Within-race and between-race recognition of transformed and untransformed faces.
    Ellis HD; Deregowski JB
    Am J Psychol; 1981 Mar; 94(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7235082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemispheric metacontrol and cerebral dominance in healthy individuals investigated by means of chimeric faces.
    Urgesi C; Bricolo E; Aglioti SM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 16099363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric asymmetries for complex visual patterns.
    Duda PD; Adams JO
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Apr; 64(2):463-8. PubMed ID: 3588191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of cognitive style and interstimulus interval on the hemispheric processing of tactile stimuli.
    Minagawa N; Kashu K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Jun; 68(3 Pt 2):1031-9. PubMed ID: 2762069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric asymmetry in a face discrimination task in infants.
    de Schonen S; Mathivet E
    Child Dev; 1990 Aug; 61(4):1192-205. PubMed ID: 2209189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cerebral lateralisation at different stages of facial processing.
    Parkin AJ; Williamson P
    Cortex; 1987 Mar; 23(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 3568709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.