These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3627939)

  • 1. Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings.
    Proctor RW; Healy AF
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):180-94. PubMed ID: 3627939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Same-different judgments of multiletter strings: insensitivity to positional bias and spacing.
    Proctor RW; Healy AF; Van Zandt T
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jan; 49(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 2011454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How serial is serial processing in vision?
    Zohary E; Hochstein S
    Perception; 1989; 18(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 2771604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of visual conspicuousness and the concept of randomness on the recognition of randomness in sequences.
    Wiegersma S
    J Gen Psychol; 1987 Apr; 114(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 3585297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Processing of identity and position information in normal and disabled readers.
    Manis FR; Morrison FJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1982 Feb; 33(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 7057137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the intricacies involved in the study of similarity judgments: comment on Ritov, Gati, and Tversky.
    Keren G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Mar; 119(1):42-3; discussion 44. PubMed ID: 2141062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serial-position curves for reaction time and accuracy in visual search: tests of a model of overlapping processing.
    Harris JR; Shaw ML; Altom MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Aug; 38(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 4088808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining attributes in specified and categorized target search: further evidence for strategic differences.
    Gathercole SE; Broadbent DE
    Mem Cognit; 1984 Jul; 12(4):329-37. PubMed ID: 6503695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols.
    Tydgat I; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):480-98. PubMed ID: 19331502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Buildup and release from proactive interference in a rhesus monkey.
    Jitsumori M; Wright AA; Shyan MR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Oct; 15(4):329-37. PubMed ID: 2794869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Equivalence classes generated by sequence training.
    Sigurdardottir ZG; Green G; Saunders RR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 2299290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing visual short-term memory: simultaneous versus sequential presentations.
    Frick RW
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Jul; 13(4):346-56. PubMed ID: 4079750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Context dependent learning in the serial RT task.
    Abrahamse EL; Verwey WB
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 17674034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remembering and constructing an order.
    Blevins-Knabe B
    J Genet Psychol; 1987 Dec; 148(4):453-68. PubMed ID: 3437271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality.
    Egeth H; Dagenbach D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 1830092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of task type and stimulus heterogeneity on the event rate function in sustained attention.
    Lanzetta TM; Dember WN; Warm JS; Berch DB
    Hum Factors; 1987 Dec; 29(6):625-33. PubMed ID: 3436619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The serial process in visual search.
    Gilden DL; Thornton TL; Marusich LR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 20515187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Changes in the reference system exemplified by a visual assessment task].
    Junghanns G; Ullsperger P; Metz AM
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1988; 196(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 2906773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Serial probe recognition performance by a rhesus monkey and a human with 10- and 20-item lists.
    Sands SF; Wright AA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Oct; 6(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 7430954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.