These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36279810)

  • 1. Optical sensing as analytical tools for meat tenderness measurements - A review.
    Kamruzzaman M
    Meat Sci; 2023 Jan; 195():109007. PubMed ID: 36279810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid Non-Destructive Detection Technology in the Field of Meat Tenderness: A Review.
    Li Y; Wang H; Yang Z; Wang X; Wang W; Hui T
    Foods; 2024 May; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 38790812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships between sensory evaluations of beef tenderness, shear force measurements and consumer characteristics.
    Van Wezemael L; De Smet S; Ueland Ø; Verbeke W
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 23962381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of beef tenderness on consumer satisfaction with steaks consumed in the home and restaurant.
    Huffman KL; Miller MF; Hoover LC; Wu CK; Brittin HC; Ramsey CB
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Jan; 74(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 8778116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness.
    Miller MF; Carr MA; Ramsey CB; Crockett KL; Hoover LC
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3062-8. PubMed ID: 11811460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry.
    Troy DJ; Kerry JP
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):214-26. PubMed ID: 20579814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel techniques to understand consumer responses towards food products: A review with a focus on meat.
    Torrico DD; Hutchings SC; Ha M; Bittner EP; Fuentes S; Warner RD; Dunshea FR
    Meat Sci; 2018 Oct; 144():30-42. PubMed ID: 30008336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-destructive assessment of instrumental and sensory tenderness of lamb meat using NIR hyperspectral imaging.
    Kamruzzaman M; Elmasry G; Sun DW; Allen P
    Food Chem; 2013 Nov; 141(1):389-96. PubMed ID: 23768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meat tenderness: advances in biology, biochemistry, molecular mechanisms and new technologies.
    Warner RD; Wheeler TL; Ha M; Li X; Bekhit AE; Morton J; Vaskoska R; Dunshea FR; Liu R; Purslow P; Zhang W
    Meat Sci; 2022 Mar; 185():108657. PubMed ID: 34998162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optical scattering with hyperspectral imaging to classify longissimus dorsi muscle based on beef tenderness using multivariate modeling.
    Cluff K; Naganathan GK; Subbiah J; Samal A; Calkins CR
    Meat Sci; 2013 Sep; 95(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23648431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of clod steaks.
    Goodson KJ; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Courington SM; Wise JW; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Feb; 80(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 11881929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of growth implants on consumer perceptions of meat tenderness in beef steers.
    Barham BL; Brooks JC; Blanton JR; Herring AD; Carr MA; Kerth CR; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):3052-6. PubMed ID: 14677861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of hyperspectral imaging in food safety inspection and control: a review.
    Feng YZ; Sun DW
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2012; 52(11):1039-58. PubMed ID: 22823350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application and recent development of research on near-infrared spectroscopy for meat quality evaluation].
    Xu X; Cheng F; Ying YB
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2009 Jul; 29(7):1876-80. PubMed ID: 19798962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New developments in shockwave technology intended for meat tenderization: Opportunities and challenges. A review.
    Bolumar T; Enneking M; Toepfl S; Heinz V
    Meat Sci; 2013 Dec; 95(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 23660173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meat quality evaluation by hyperspectral imaging technique: an overview.
    Elmasry G; Barbin DF; Sun DW; Allen P
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2012; 52(8):689-711. PubMed ID: 22591341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Measurement of pork tenderness by using steady spatially-resolved spectroscopy].
    Zhang GW; Wen X; Wang ZY; Zhao DJ; Huang L
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2010 Oct; 30(10):2793-6. PubMed ID: 21137423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer impressions of Tender Select beef.
    Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Meade MK; Reagan JO; Byrnes BL; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Oct; 79(10):2605-14. PubMed ID: 11721839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks.
    Behrends JM; Goodson KJ; Koohmaraie M; Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Wise JW; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 15705763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy and repeatability of untrained laboratory consumer panelists in detecting differences in beef longissimus tenderness.
    Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):557-62. PubMed ID: 14974555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.